The impact of Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether CAS 83016-70-0 on foam density and hardness

The Impact of Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether (CAS 83016-70-0) on Foam Density and Hardness

Foam, that fluffy, squishy, sometimes rigid, sometimes soft material we encounter daily—from the cushion under our butts to the insulation in our walls—is more complex than it seems. Behind its airy structure lies a symphony of chemistry, where each ingredient plays a crucial role in determining the final product’s performance. Among these ingredients is a compound known by its CAS number: Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether, or CAS 83016-70-0 for short.

Now, I know what you’re thinking—what kind of name is that? It sounds like something out of a mad scientist’s notebook. But bear with me, because this compound has some fascinating effects on foam properties, especially density and hardness. And if you’re involved in polyurethane manufacturing, polymer science, or materials engineering, understanding how this compound works could be your golden ticket to creating better, stronger, lighter—or just plain cooler—foams.

🧪 A Quick Introduction to Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether

Let’s start by breaking down the name. Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether might sound like a tongue-twister, but it’s actually a mouthful of chemical functionality. This compound belongs to the family of amine-based polyether surfactants, commonly used as crosslinkers or catalyst boosters in polyurethane formulations.

📊 Basic Chemical Information:

This compound contains both amine groups and polyether chains, making it amphiphilic—meaning it can interact with both polar and non-polar substances. That’s why it’s often used in combination with other surfactants and blowing agents to control cell structure and foam stability during the reaction process.

💨 The Foaming Process: A Brief Recap

Before diving into how CAS 83016-70-0 affects foam density and hardness, let’s take a quick detour through the world of foam formation. Polyurethane foam is created when a polyol reacts with an isocyanate in the presence of water (or physical blowing agents), catalysts, and surfactants.

Here’s the simplified version:

• Polyol + Isocyanate → Urethane bond
• Water + Isocyanate → CO₂ gas (blowing agent)
• Surfactants (like CAS 83016-70-0) → Stabilize bubbles and control cell size
• Catalysts → Speed up reactions

During this process, the foam expands, solidifies, and sets into its final shape. The density and hardness are determined by a variety of factors, including:

• Amount and type of blowing agent
• Ratio of isocyanate to polyol
• Reaction temperature
• Catalyst system
• And yes—you guessed it—surfactants like our featured compound.

📐 Measuring Foam Density and Hardness

Before we dive into the meat of the article, let’s define what density and hardness mean in the context of foam:

In simple terms, density tells you how much the foam weighs per cubic meter, while hardness tells you how firm or squishy it is when you press on it.

Now, here’s where things get interesting.

🌟 How CAS 83016-70-0 Influences Foam Density

Let’s imagine you’re trying to bake a soufflé. You want it light, airy, and not too dense. But if you don’t use the right amount of egg whites or baking powder, it collapses into a pancake. Similarly, foam needs help maintaining its structure during expansion—and that’s where CAS 83016-70-0 comes in.

This compound acts as a cell stabilizer. Its amine groups react slightly with isocyanates, contributing to crosslinking, while its polyether backbone helps disperse the components evenly and stabilize the growing cells.

🔬 Experimental Findings:

A 2019 study published in the Journal of Applied Polymer Science compared the effect of varying amounts of CAS 83016-70-0 on flexible polyurethane foam. Here’s a summary of their findings:

pphp = parts per hundred polyol

From the table above, we see that adding around 0.6 pphp of CAS 83016-70-0 gives the lowest foam density. Beyond that, the foam becomes too tightly packed, and the excessive surfactant may interfere with gas release, leading to collapse.

So, like Goldilocks’ porridge, you need just the right amount—too little and the foam is heavy and unstable; too much and it collapses.

💪 The Role of CAS 83016-70-0 in Foam Hardness

If density is about weight, hardness is about strength. Think of it like comparing a marshmallow to a hockey puck. Both are “soft” in their own way, but one gives way easily while the other resists pressure.

CAS 83016-70-0 influences foam hardness in two main ways:

1. Crosslinking: The amine groups can react with isocyanates to form urea bonds, increasing crosslink density.
2. Cell Structure Control: Smaller, more uniform cells tend to give higher resistance to compression.

🧪 Real-World Example:

An industrial test conducted by a major foam manufacturer in Germany (reported in Polymer Engineering & Science, 2021) showed that adding 0.5 pphp of CAS 83016-70-0 increased the Indentation Load Deflection (ILD) from 250 N to 320 N, indicating a significant increase in perceived hardness.

Interestingly, even though the foam became harder with more additive, the increase wasn’t linear. At higher levels, the effect plateaued—suggesting there’s a limit to how much this compound can contribute to hardness without affecting other properties.

⚖️ Balancing Act: Density vs. Hardness

Here’s the tricky part: manipulating foam properties isn’t like adjusting the thermostat. Turning one knob affects several systems at once. So while CAS 83016-70-0 can reduce density and increase hardness, pushing too far in either direction can lead to undesirable side effects.

For example:

• Too low a density might result in poor mechanical strength.
• Too high hardness can make the foam uncomfortable for applications like seating or bedding.

That’s why formulators treat additives like spices—carefully calibrated to bring out the best flavor without overpowering the dish.

📋 Summary Table: Trade-offs of Using CAS 83016-70-0

🌍 Global Trends and Industry Usage

CAS 83016-70-0 isn’t just popular—it’s practically a staple in modern foam production. According to a 2022 market report by Smithers Pira, over 65% of flexible foam manufacturers in Asia-Pacific use this compound regularly, citing its dual benefits of improving both foam structure and mechanical properties.

In Europe, environmental regulations have pushed manufacturers to find alternatives to traditional silicone surfactants, and compounds like CAS 83016-70-0 have emerged as viable eco-friendlier options—especially when combined with bio-based polyols.

Meanwhile, North American producers have reported using this compound primarily in automotive seating and furniture padding, where both comfort and durability are key selling points.

🧠 Why It Works: The Chemistry Behind the Magic

Let’s geek out a bit and talk about the molecular-level magic happening inside the foam.

CAS 83016-70-0 has three methylhydroxyethyl groups attached to a central bisaminoethyl ether core. Those hydroxyl (-OH) groups can act as reactive sites, participating in the polyurethane network formation. Meanwhile, the amine groups serve as mild catalysts, accelerating the reaction between isocyanate and water.

This dual functionality makes it unique. Unlike pure surfactants (which only stabilize bubbles), or pure catalysts (which only speed up reactions), CAS 83016-70-0 does a bit of both.

Here’s a simplified schematic of what happens:

Isocyanate + Polyol → Urethane bond
Isocyanate + Water → CO₂ + Amine salt (blowing)
CAS 83016-70-0 → Reacts slightly with isocyanate → Crosslinks + Stabilizes foam cells

Because of its partial reactivity, it integrates into the foam matrix without over-crosslinking, which would make the foam brittle. Instead, it creates a balanced network—strong enough to resist deformation, yet flexible enough to absorb impact.

🛠️ Practical Tips for Formulators

If you’re working with foam formulations and considering using CAS 83016-70-0, here are a few tips based on real-world experience:

✅ Start Low and Adjust Gradually

As shown earlier, small additions (around 0.3–0.6 pphp) yield the most noticeable improvements. Going beyond that can cause diminishing returns or unwanted side effects.

✅ Combine with Silicone Surfactants

Many manufacturers use CAS 83016-70-0 in conjunction with traditional silicone surfactants. This hybrid approach offers the best of both worlds—excellent cell stabilization from silicone and enhanced hardness from the amine ether.

✅ Monitor Reaction Temperature

Higher temperatures can accelerate the reaction, reducing gel time and possibly causing premature skinning. Since CAS 83016-70-0 contributes to early-stage crosslinking, keeping the reaction temperature within optimal range is essential.

✅ Test Mechanical Properties Thoroughly

Don’t rely solely on density measurements. Always test hardness, tensile strength, elongation, and compression set—especially if you’re targeting specific end-use applications like automotive or medical foams.

🧬 Future Prospects and Research Directions

As sustainability becomes increasingly important, researchers are exploring whether CAS 83016-70-0 can be synthesized from renewable feedstocks or modified to improve biodegradability.

Some labs are also investigating nanocomposite versions of this compound, where nanoparticles are embedded within the surfactant matrix to further enhance mechanical properties without increasing viscosity.

Additionally, machine learning models are being trained to predict foam behavior based on formulation parameters—including the use of additives like CAS 83016-70-0. This could revolutionize foam development by reducing trial-and-error cycles and speeding up innovation.

🧾 Conclusion

In conclusion, Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether (CAS 83016-70-0) is more than just a long-winded chemical name—it’s a versatile additive that significantly impacts foam density and hardness. By stabilizing foam cells and promoting controlled crosslinking, it allows manufacturers to fine-tune foam characteristics for a wide range of applications.

Whether you’re crafting plush cushions or rugged insulation panels, understanding how this compound behaves in different formulations can give you a competitive edge in the ever-evolving world of foam technology.

And remember—when it comes to foam, balance is everything. Like a perfectly whipped meringue or a well-baked loaf of bread, the right mix of ingredients and timing can turn ordinary materials into something extraordinary.

📚 References

1. Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Wang, X. (2019). Effect of Amine-Based Surfactants on Flexible Polyurethane Foam Morphology. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 136(18), 47562–47570.

2. Müller, R., Becker, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2021). Optimization of Foam Hardness in Automotive Seating Applications. Polymer Engineering & Science, 61(5), 1123–1131.

3. Smithers Pira. (2022). Global Polyurethane Foam Market Report. Manchester, UK.

4. Chen, L., Liu, J., & Zhao, K. (2020). Green Surfactants for Polyurethane Foams: Opportunities and Challenges. Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews, 13(3), 215–224.

5. Tanaka, H., Sato, A., & Yamamoto, T. (2018). Structure-Property Relationships in Amine-Terminated Polyethers for Foam Applications. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 54(2), 189–204.

If you’ve made it this far, congratulations! You’re now officially a foam connoisseur. Go forth and impress your colleagues with your newfound knowledge of CAS 83016-70-0. Or better yet, go make some foam that’s just the right blend of soft and strong. 🎉

Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com