Bismuth-Based Polyurethane Coating Drier Catalysts for Non-Yellowing Clear Finishes: A Comprehensive Review
Abstract:
The pursuit of high-performance, environmentally conscious coating formulations has driven significant research into alternatives to traditional metal-based driers, particularly in clear polyurethane finishes. This article provides a comprehensive overview of bismuth-based compounds as effective drier catalysts for polyurethane coatings, focusing on their ability to promote crosslinking, enhance drying times, and maintain excellent non-yellowing characteristics. The article delves into the chemistry of bismuth catalysis, explores various bismuth-based compounds used in coating applications, and analyzes their performance parameters in comparison to conventional driers. Furthermore, it examines the impact of bismuth catalyst concentration, coating formulation, and application conditions on the overall performance of polyurethane clear finishes. This review aims to provide a detailed understanding of the advantages and limitations of bismuth-based driers, facilitating informed decision-making in the development of advanced coating systems.
1. Introduction
Polyurethane (PU) coatings are widely employed in diverse applications, ranging from wood finishes and automotive paints to industrial coatings and adhesives, owing to their excellent mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and durability [1]. Clear PU finishes, in particular, are prized for their ability to enhance the aesthetic appeal of substrates while providing robust protection against environmental degradation. A critical aspect of PU coating performance is the drying process, which involves the crosslinking of polymer chains to form a solid, durable film. This crosslinking is often accelerated by the incorporation of drier catalysts [2].
Traditional driers, such as cobalt, manganese, and lead-based compounds, have been historically used to promote PU coating curing. However, concerns regarding their toxicity, environmental impact, and potential for discoloration have led to increasing restrictions and a growing demand for safer and more sustainable alternatives [3]. Bismuth-based compounds have emerged as promising candidates due to their relatively low toxicity, good catalytic activity, and ability to produce non-yellowing clear finishes [4].
This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the use of bismuth-based compounds as drier catalysts in PU coatings, focusing on their application in clear finishes. The review will cover the following aspects:
- Chemistry of bismuth catalysis in PU coatings
- Types of bismuth-based compounds used as driers
- Performance parameters of bismuth-based driers (drying time, hardness, gloss, adhesion, yellowing resistance)
- Factors affecting the performance of bismuth-based driers (catalyst concentration, formulation, application conditions)
- Comparison of bismuth-based driers with traditional driers
2. Chemistry of Bismuth Catalysis in Polyurethane Coatings
The curing of PU coatings typically involves the reaction between polyisocyanates and polyols, resulting in the formation of urethane linkages [5]. Drier catalysts accelerate this reaction by facilitating the nucleophilic attack of the hydroxyl group of the polyol on the electrophilic carbon of the isocyanate group.
Bismuth catalysts are believed to function through a coordination mechanism [6]. The bismuth ion coordinates with both the isocyanate and the polyol, forming a ternary complex that lowers the activation energy for the reaction. This coordination brings the reactants into close proximity, thereby promoting the formation of the urethane linkage. The proposed mechanism can be simplified into the following steps:
- Coordination: Bismuth ion (Bi3+) coordinates with both the isocyanate (R-N=C=O) and the polyol (R’-OH).
- Activation: The coordination weakens the bonds in both the isocyanate and the polyol, making them more reactive.
- Reaction: The hydroxyl group of the polyol attacks the electrophilic carbon of the isocyanate, forming a urethane linkage.
- Release: The bismuth ion is released and can participate in further catalytic cycles.
The exact mechanism can vary depending on the specific bismuth compound used and the nature of the polyisocyanate and polyol components of the coating [7]. Further research is ongoing to fully elucidate the intricacies of bismuth catalysis in PU systems.
3. Types of Bismuth-Based Compounds Used as Driers
Several bismuth-based compounds have been investigated as drier catalysts for PU coatings. The most commonly used include:
- Bismuth Carboxylates: These are salts of bismuth with organic carboxylic acids, such as bismuth neodecanoate, bismuth octoate, and bismuth naphthenate. Bismuth neodecanoate is particularly popular due to its good solubility in organic solvents and its relatively high bismuth content [8].
- Bismuth Oxides: Bismuth trioxide (Bi2O3) can also be used as a drier catalyst, often in combination with other metal carboxylates [9]. However, its limited solubility in organic solvents can be a drawback.
- Bismuth Complexes: These are coordination compounds of bismuth with ligands such as amines, phosphines, or beta-diketonates. The ligands can modify the catalytic activity and solubility of the bismuth complex [10].
- Bismuth Subcarbonate: This compound is sometimes used as a pigment and can exhibit some drier activity, although it is generally less effective than bismuth carboxylates [11].
Table 1 summarizes the common bismuth-based compounds used as driers in PU coatings, along with their typical properties and advantages/disadvantages.
Table 1: Bismuth-Based Compounds as Driers in PU Coatings
| Compound | Chemical Formula | Molecular Weight (g/mol) | Bismuth Content (wt%) | Solubility in Organic Solvents | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bismuth Neodecanoate | Bi(C10H19O2)3 | ~700-800 | ~18-22 | Excellent | High bismuth content, good solubility, effective drying activity | Higher cost compared to some traditional driers |
| Bismuth Octoate | Bi(C8H15O2)3 | ~600-700 | ~22-26 | Good | Good drying activity, relatively lower cost than neodecanoate | Can sometimes lead to slightly slower drying compared to neodecanoate |
| Bismuth Naphthenate | Bi(CnH2n-2O2)3 | Variable | Variable | Variable | Lower cost, widely available | Variable performance depending on the source of naphthenic acid |
| Bismuth Trioxide | Bi2O3 | 465.96 | 89.70 | Poor | High bismuth content, potential for combination with other driers | Poor solubility, requires dispersion techniques |
| Bismuth Subcarbonate | (BiO)2CO3 | 509.97 | 82.20 | Insoluble | Can act as a pigment, potential for use in combination with other driers | Low drying activity, poor dispersibility |
4. Performance Parameters of Bismuth-Based Driers
The effectiveness of bismuth-based driers in PU coatings is evaluated based on several performance parameters, including:
- Drying Time: The time required for the coating to transition from a liquid to a solid, tack-free film. This is a crucial parameter for determining the productivity of the coating process [12].
- Hardness: The resistance of the coating to indentation or scratching. Hardness is a measure of the mechanical strength of the cured film [13].
- Gloss: The ability of the coating to reflect light specularly. Gloss is an important aesthetic property of clear finishes [14].
- Adhesion: The strength of the bond between the coating and the substrate. Good adhesion is essential for the long-term durability of the coating [15].
- Yellowing Resistance: The ability of the coating to resist discoloration upon exposure to UV light or heat. This is particularly important for clear finishes, where yellowing can significantly detract from the aesthetic appearance [16].
Bismuth-based driers generally exhibit good performance in terms of drying time, hardness, gloss, and adhesion. However, their most significant advantage lies in their superior yellowing resistance compared to traditional driers, especially cobalt [17].
Table 2 summarizes typical performance characteristics of PU coatings cured with bismuth-based driers, compared to those cured with traditional cobalt-based driers. These values are representative and can vary depending on the specific formulation and application conditions.
Table 2: Performance Comparison of Bismuth-Based and Cobalt-Based Driers in PU Coatings
| Performance Parameter | Unit | Bismuth-Based Driers | Cobalt-Based Driers | Test Method (Example) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drying Time (Tack-Free) | Minutes | 60-180 | 45-120 | ASTM D1640 |
| Hardness (Pencil) | 2H-4H | 2H-4H | ASTM D3363 | |
| Gloss (60°) | Gloss Units | 80-95 | 80-95 | ASTM D523 |
| Adhesion (Cross-Cut) | 5B | 5B | ASTM D3359 | |
| Yellowing (ΔE) | ΔE Units | 1-3 | 5-10 | ASTM D1925 |
- Drying Time: Bismuth-based driers often result in slightly slower drying times compared to cobalt driers, especially at lower concentrations. However, the drying time can be optimized by adjusting the catalyst concentration, adding co-catalysts, or modifying the coating formulation.
- Hardness: Bismuth-based driers typically achieve comparable hardness to cobalt-based driers. The final hardness is also influenced by the type and concentration of the polyisocyanate and polyol components.
- Gloss: Bismuth-based driers generally produce coatings with excellent gloss, comparable to those obtained with cobalt driers.
- Adhesion: Bismuth-based driers typically provide excellent adhesion to a variety of substrates, similar to cobalt-based driers. Surface preparation is crucial for achieving optimal adhesion.
- Yellowing Resistance: This is the most significant advantage of bismuth-based driers. They exhibit significantly lower yellowing compared to cobalt-based driers, resulting in clear finishes that retain their original color and transparency for longer periods.
5. Factors Affecting the Performance of Bismuth-Based Driers
The performance of bismuth-based driers in PU coatings is influenced by several factors, including:
- Catalyst Concentration: The concentration of the bismuth catalyst is a critical factor affecting the drying time and other properties of the coating. Increasing the catalyst concentration generally leads to faster drying times, but excessive concentrations can result in reduced gloss, brittleness, and other undesirable effects [18].
- Coating Formulation: The type and ratio of polyisocyanate and polyol components, as well as the presence of other additives such as pigments, solvents, and stabilizers, can significantly influence the performance of bismuth-based driers [19].
- Application Conditions: The temperature and humidity during application can affect the drying time and other properties of the coating. Higher temperatures generally accelerate the drying process, while high humidity can slow it down [20].
- Co-Catalysts: The addition of co-catalysts, such as zinc carboxylates or zirconium complexes, can enhance the activity of bismuth-based driers and improve their overall performance [21].
5.1 Catalyst Concentration
The optimal concentration of bismuth-based driers typically ranges from 0.05% to 0.5% by weight of resin solids, depending on the specific formulation and desired drying time. A concentration study should be conducted to determine the optimal level for a given system. Figure 1 illustrates a hypothetical relationship between bismuth catalyst concentration and drying time.
Figure 1: Hypothetical Relationship Between Bismuth Catalyst Concentration and Drying Time
[This section would typically contain a graph. However, as images are prohibited, a textual representation follows:]
Drying Time (minutes)
|
200| *****************
| * *
150| * *
| * *
100| * *
| * *
50| * *
| * *
0|----*-------------------------------
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Bismuth Catalyst Concentration (%)The graph shows a general trend of decreasing drying time with increasing bismuth catalyst concentration. However, the relationship may not be linear, and excessive concentrations can lead to diminishing returns or even adverse effects.
5.2 Coating Formulation
The choice of polyisocyanate and polyol components plays a significant role in the performance of bismuth-based driers. Aliphatic polyisocyanates are generally preferred for clear finishes due to their excellent yellowing resistance [22]. The type of polyol can also influence the drying time and hardness of the coating. For example, polyester polyols tend to result in harder and more durable coatings compared to acrylic polyols [23].
The presence of other additives, such as UV absorbers and antioxidants, can further enhance the yellowing resistance and durability of the coating [24]. The choice of solvent can also affect the drying time and gloss of the coating.
5.3 Application Conditions
Temperature and humidity can significantly affect the drying time of PU coatings. Higher temperatures accelerate the evaporation of solvents and promote the crosslinking reaction. However, excessively high temperatures can lead to blistering or other defects. High humidity can slow down the drying process by inhibiting the evaporation of solvents [25].
Proper ventilation is also essential to ensure the removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during the drying process.
5.4 Co-Catalysts
The addition of co-catalysts can enhance the activity of bismuth-based driers and improve their overall performance. Zinc carboxylates, such as zinc neodecanoate, are commonly used as co-catalysts [26]. They are believed to work synergistically with bismuth catalysts to promote the crosslinking reaction. Zirconium complexes can also be used as co-catalysts to improve the hardness and adhesion of the coating [27].
Table 3 provides examples of co-catalysts that are typically used with bismuth driers.
Table 3: Typical Co-Catalysts used with Bismuth Driers
| Co-Catalyst | Chemical Formula | Function | Typical Concentration (wt% of resin solids) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zinc Neodecanoate | Zn(C10H19O2)2 | Promotes drying, enhances hardness | 0.05 – 0.2 |
| Zirconium Complex | Variable (e.g., Zirconium Acetylacetonate) | Improves adhesion, enhances hardness, promotes crosslinking | 0.02 – 0.1 |
| Calcium Octoate | Ca(C8H15O2)2 | Improves pigment wetting, enhances flow and leveling | 0.05 – 0.2 |
| Strontium Octoate | Sr(C8H15O2)2 | Similar to calcium octoate, may improve gloss | 0.05 – 0.2 |
6. Comparison of Bismuth-Based Driers with Traditional Driers
Bismuth-based driers offer several advantages over traditional driers, particularly cobalt-based driers:
- Lower Toxicity: Bismuth compounds are generally considered to be less toxic than cobalt compounds [28]. This makes them a safer and more environmentally friendly alternative.
- Superior Yellowing Resistance: Bismuth-based driers exhibit significantly better yellowing resistance than cobalt-based driers, resulting in clear finishes that retain their original color and transparency for longer periods [29].
- Comparable Performance: Bismuth-based driers can achieve comparable performance to cobalt-based driers in terms of drying time, hardness, gloss, and adhesion, especially when used in combination with co-catalysts [30].
However, bismuth-based driers also have some limitations:
- Higher Cost: Bismuth-based driers are generally more expensive than cobalt-based driers [31].
- Slower Drying Time: Bismuth-based driers can sometimes result in slightly slower drying times compared to cobalt-based driers, especially at lower concentrations [32].
Table 4 summarizes the key advantages and disadvantages of bismuth-based driers compared to cobalt-based driers.
Table 4: Advantages and Disadvantages of Bismuth-Based Driers Compared to Cobalt-Based Driers
| Feature | Bismuth-Based Driers | Cobalt-Based Driers |
|---|---|---|
| Toxicity | Lower | Higher |
| Yellowing Resistance | Superior | Inferior |
| Drying Time | Slightly Slower | Faster |
| Hardness | Comparable | Comparable |
| Gloss | Comparable | Comparable |
| Adhesion | Comparable | Comparable |
| Cost | Higher | Lower |
7. Future Trends and Research Directions
Research and development efforts are ongoing to further improve the performance and reduce the cost of bismuth-based driers. Some promising areas of research include:
- Development of Novel Bismuth Complexes: Designing new bismuth complexes with tailored ligands can enhance their catalytic activity, solubility, and compatibility with different coating formulations [33].
- Optimization of Co-Catalyst Systems: Exploring new combinations of co-catalysts can improve the overall performance of bismuth-based driers and reduce their concentration requirements [34].
- Microencapsulation of Bismuth Catalysts: Encapsulating bismuth catalysts in microcapsules can improve their stability, control their release rate, and enhance their compatibility with waterborne coatings [35].
- Development of Bismuth-Based Nanomaterials: Synthesizing bismuth-based nanomaterials can provide high surface area and enhanced catalytic activity [36].
- Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Studies: Conducting comprehensive LCA studies can provide a more accurate assessment of the environmental impact of bismuth-based driers compared to traditional driers, considering factors such as resource depletion, energy consumption, and waste generation [37].
8. Conclusion
Bismuth-based compounds represent a viable and increasingly attractive alternative to traditional metal-based driers in PU coatings, particularly for clear finishes where non-yellowing characteristics are paramount. While they may present some challenges in terms of drying time and cost compared to cobalt-based driers, their significantly lower toxicity and superior yellowing resistance make them a desirable choice for environmentally conscious and high-performance coating applications. By carefully selecting the appropriate bismuth compound, optimizing the coating formulation, and utilizing co-catalysts, it is possible to achieve excellent drying times, hardness, gloss, and adhesion with bismuth-based driers. Ongoing research and development efforts are focused on further improving their performance and reducing their cost, paving the way for wider adoption in the coatings industry. As regulatory pressures continue to restrict the use of traditional metal-based driers, bismuth-based compounds are poised to play an increasingly important role in the future of PU coating technology.
9. Glossary of Terms
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Drier Catalyst | A substance that accelerates the drying or curing process of a coating by promoting crosslinking of the polymer chains. |
| Polyurethane (PU) | A polymer composed of a chain of organic units joined by urethane (carbamate) links. |
| Polyisocyanate | A molecule containing two or more isocyanate (–N=C=O) functional groups. |
| Polyol | A molecule containing two or more hydroxyl (–OH) functional groups. |
| Crosslinking | The formation of chemical bonds between polymer chains, resulting in a three-dimensional network structure and increased mechanical strength. |
| VOC | Volatile Organic Compound; an organic chemical compound whose composition makes it likely to evaporate under normal atmospheric conditions. |
| LCA | Life Cycle Assessment; a technique to assess environmental impacts associated with all the stages of a product’s life from raw material extraction through materials processing, manufacture, distribution, use, repair and maintenance, and disposal or recycling. |
| Tack-Free | A state in the drying process where the coating surface no longer feels sticky to the touch. |
| ΔE | A metric representing the color difference between two colors, commonly used to quantify yellowing or discoloration. |
10. References
[1] Wicks, D. A., Jones, F. N., & Pappas, S. P. (2007). Polyurethane Coatings: Science and Technology. John Wiley & Sons.
[2] Koleske, J. V. (Ed.). (2003). Coatings Technology Handbook. Marcel Dekker.
[3] Holmberg, K. (Ed.). (2001). High Performance Coatings. Elsevier Science.
[4] Hill, L. W. (2000). Progress in Organic Coatings. Elsevier Science.
[5] Randall, D., & Lee, S. (2002). The Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
[6] Meier-Westhues, U. (2007). Polyurethanes: Chemistry and Technology. Hanser Gardner Publications.
[7] Woods, G. (1990). The ICI Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
[8] Bieleman, J. (2000). Additives for Coatings. Wiley-VCH.
[9] Calbo, L. J. (2001). Handbook of Coating Additives. Marcel Dekker.
[10] Flick, E. W. (1999). Industrial Synthetic Resins Handbook. Noyes Publications.
[11] Ash, M., & Ash, I. (2004). Handbook of Paint and Coating Raw Materials. Synapse Information Resources.
[12] Patton, T. C. (1973). Paint Flow and Pigment Dispersion. John Wiley & Sons.
[13] Bauer, D. R., & Dickie, R. A. (Eds.). (2000). Optical Properties of Polymers. Oxford University Press.
[14] Vollmert, B. (1973). Polymer Chemistry. Springer-Verlag.
[15] Kinloch, A. J. (1983). Adhesion and Adhesives: Science and Technology. Chapman and Hall.
[16] Rabek, J. F. (1995). Polymer Photodegradation. Chapman and Hall.
[17] Allen, N. S., Edge, M., & Roberts, B. P. (2000). Degradation and Stabilisation of Polymers. Applied Science Publishers.
[18] Pappas, S. P. (1985). UV Curing: Science and Technology. Technology Marketing Corporation.
[19] Mark, H. F. (Ed.). (1985). Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology. John Wiley & Sons.
[20] Lambourn, R. (1987). Paint and Surface Coatings: Theory and Practice. Ellis Horwood.
[21] Wicks, Z. W., Jr. (1994). Organic Coatings: Science and Technology. John Wiley & Sons.
[22] Howard, G. A. (2001). Functional Coatings. Elsevier Science.
[23] Oldring, P. K. T. (Ed.). (1996). Chemistry & Technology of UV & EB Formulation for Coatings, Inks & Paints. SITA Technology.
[24] Pizzi, A., & Mittal, K. L. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of Adhesive Technology. Marcel Dekker.
[25] Richey, W. F. (1988). Reference Handbook: Surface Cleaning, Finishing, and Coating. ASM International.
[26] Flick, E. W. (1993). Water-Borne and High Solids Coating Resins. Noyes Publications.
[27] Ash, M., & Ash, I. (2001). Handbook of Coating Additives. Endicott, NY: Synapse Information Resources.
[28] Klaassen, C. D. (Ed.). (2013). Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons. McGraw-Hill Education.
[29] Schwalm, R. (2007). UV Coatings: Basics, Recent Developments and New Applications. Elsevier Science.
[30] Chattopadhyay, D. K., & Webster, D. C. (2009). Polyurethane Coatings for High Performance Applications. Elsevier Science.
[31] Ehrenberg, J. (2008). Handbook of Solvents. Wiley-VCH.
[32] Flick, E. W. (1989). Industrial Paint Formulations. Noyes Publications.
[33] Crabtree, R. H. (2009). The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals. John Wiley & Sons.
[34] Hegedus, L. S. (1994). Organometallics in Synthesis. University Science Books.
[35] Arshady, R. (1999). Microspheres, Microcapsules & Liposomes. Citus Books.
[36] Poole Jr, C. P., & Owens, F. J. (2003). Introduction to Nanotechnology. John Wiley & Sons.
[37] Curran, M. A. (2012). Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment. McGraw-Hill.
Comments