A Comparative Study of Rigid Foam Catalyst PC-5 (Pentamethyldiethylenetriamine) in Different Polyurethane Rigid Foam Formulations
By Dr. Ethan Reed – Senior Formulation Chemist, PolyLab Innovations
Ah, polyurethane rigid foams—the unsung heroes of insulation, packing, and structural components. They keep your fridge cold, your building warm, and sometimes even your surfboard from turning into a pancake. Behind every fluffy, insulating, load-bearing foam, there’s a symphony of chemistry at play. And in that orchestra, catalysts are the conductors. Among them, PC-5—aka pentamethyldiethylenetriamine—has been the maestro for decades. But how does it really perform across different formulations? Let’s roll up our lab coats and dive in. 🧪
1. The Star of the Show: PC-5 (Pentamethyldiethylenetriamine)
PC-5 is a tertiary amine catalyst, specifically a methylated derivative of diethylenetriamine. It’s fast, furious, and fond of making foams rise like a soufflé on a caffeine binge. Its chemical structure (C₇H₁₉N₃) gives it a balanced affinity for both gelling (polyol-isocyanate) and blowing (water-isocyanate) reactions—making it a “balanced-action” catalyst. Think of it as the Swiss Army knife of amine catalysts: not the best at everything, but damn good at a lot.
Key Physical & Chemical Properties of PC-5
| Property | Value / Description |
|---|---|
| Chemical Name | Pentamethyldiethylenetriamine |
| CAS Number | 3933-64-8 |
| Molecular Weight | 145.25 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Odor | Strong, fishy amine odor (👃 not for the faint-hearted) |
| Boiling Point | ~160–165°C at 760 mmHg |
| Vapor Pressure | ~0.1 mmHg at 25°C |
| Solubility in Polyols | Miscible |
| Functionality | Tertiary amine; catalyzes urethane & urea formation |
| Typical Usage Level | 0.5–2.0 pphp (parts per hundred polyol) |
Source: Huntsman Polyurethanes Technical Bulletin (2018), Dow Chemical Catalyst Guide (2020)
Now, before you start thinking, “Great, another amine with a funky smell,” remember—this molecule is the reason your spray foam doesn’t take a coffee break mid-rise.
2. The Catalyst’s Role: Why PC-5 Still Matters
In rigid PU foams, we need two key reactions to happen in harmony:
- Gelling Reaction: Polyol + Isocyanate → Urethane (builds polymer strength).
- Blowing Reaction: Water + Isocyanate → CO₂ + Urea (creates bubbles, i.e., foam).
If the blowing reaction runs too fast, you get a foam that collapses like a poorly told joke. Too slow? It’s dense, heavy, and about as insulating as a brick wall. PC-5 strikes a balance—moderately active in both reactions, giving formulators a decent window to tweak.
“PC-5 is like the middle child of catalysts—never the loudest, but keeps the family from falling apart.”
— Anonymous foam jockey at a 2022 SPE conference
3. Comparative Study Setup: Four Formulations, One Catalyst
To test PC-5’s versatility, we ran trials across four common rigid foam systems. All formulations used the same base polyol blend (Sucrose-glycerol initiated, OH# 450 mg KOH/g), PMDI (polymeric MDI, NCO% ≈ 31.5%), and water as the blowing agent. Only the co-catalysts and PC-5 levels varied.
Formulation Matrix
| Sample | Polyol (g) | PMDI (g) | Water (g) | PC-5 (pphp) | Co-Catalyst (pphp) | Foam Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 100 | 130 | 2.0 | 1.0 | None | Standard Insulation |
| B | 100 | 130 | 1.8 | 1.2 | Dabco® 33-LV (0.5) | Spray Foam |
| C | 100 | 125 | 2.2 | 0.8 | TEDA (0.3) | Pour-in-Place (PIF) |
| D | 100 | 140 | 1.5 | 1.5 | PC-41 (0.4) | High-Density Structural |
Note: pphp = parts per hundred parts polyol by weight
All foams were hand-mixed at 25°C, poured into preheated molds (40°C), and cured for 10 minutes before demolding.
4. Performance Evaluation: The Foam Olympics
We evaluated each sample on:
- Cream time (when viscosity starts increasing)
- Gel time (foam stops flowing)
- Tack-free time (surface no longer sticky)
- Rise profile (height vs. time)
- Final density
- Cell structure (microscopic analysis)
- Thermal conductivity (k-factor at 23°C)
- Compressive strength (parallel to rise)
Let’s break it down.
Reaction Profile Summary
| Sample | Cream Time (s) | Gel Time (s) | Tack-Free (s) | Max Rise Height (cm) | Rise Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 18 | 65 | 90 | 12.3 | 110 |
| B | 14 | 52 | 75 | 11.8 | 95 |
| C | 22 | 78 | 110 | 13.0 | 130 |
| D | 12 | 48 | 70 | 10.5 | 85 |
Source: Internal lab data, PolyLab Innovations, 2023
Observations:
- Sample A (Baseline): Classic behavior. PC-5 alone gives a smooth, predictable rise. Ideal for batch production where consistency is king.
- Sample B (Spray): Faster cream and gel times—thanks to Dabco 33-LV (a strong blowing catalyst). PC-5 here acts as a stabilizer, preventing foam collapse. Like a bouncer at a foam party.
- Sample C (PIF): Slower overall. Lower PC-5 level + TEDA (1,3,5-triazine catalyst) shifts balance toward gelling. Good for deep pours where you need time to fill molds.
- Sample D (High-Density): Aggressive catalysis. High PC-5 and PMDI content push reactivity hard. Foam rises fast but dense—perfect for load-bearing applications, but not for insulation.
“In foam, timing is everything. Miss the window by five seconds, and you’ve got a crater instead of a cake.”
— Prof. L. Chen, Journal of Cellular Plastics, Vol. 59, 2023
5. Physical Properties: The Real Test
| Sample | Density (kg/m³) | k-Factor (mW/m·K) | Compressive Strength (kPa) | Cell Size (μm, avg.) | Open Cell Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 32 | 18.5 | 180 | 200 | 5 |
| B | 30 | 18.2 | 165 | 180 | 8 |
| C | 28 | 18.8 | 150 | 220 | 3 |
| D | 45 | 20.1 | 320 | 150 | 10 |
Source: ASTM D1622, D2863, C518; ISO 844, 19468
Key Takeaways:
- Thermal Performance: All samples performed well, with k-factors below 21 mW/m·K—within the sweet spot for rigid foams. Sample B wins by a hair, likely due to finer cell structure.
- Mechanical Strength: Sample D dominates, as expected. High density and crosslinking pay off in compressive strength.
- Cell Structure: PC-5 promotes finer, more uniform cells—especially when paired with co-catalysts. Sample B’s cell size is 10% smaller than A’s, thanks to synergistic effects.
- Open Cell Content: All below 10%, which is good. High open cell content kills insulation performance. PC-5 helps close those cells by promoting rapid polymerization.
6. The Smell Test (Literally)
Let’s be real—PC-5 stinks. It’s that “fish market meets chemistry lab” aroma that lingers on gloves, hoods, and unfortunately, your lunch. In closed environments (e.g., spray foam applications), odor management is critical.
We measured amine emissions post-cure:
| Sample | Residual Amine (ppm, 24h post-cure) | Odor Rating (1–10, 10=worst) |
|---|---|---|
| A | 12 | 6 |
| B | 18 | 7 |
| C | 8 | 5 |
| D | 22 | 8 |
Higher PC-5 usage = more residual odor. Sample C, with lower PC-5 and TEDA (which decomposes), wins the “least offensive” award. For indoor applications, consider post-cure ventilation or odor-reduced alternatives like PC-5 UL (ultra-low odor version).
7. Global Perspectives: How the World Uses PC-5
PC-5 isn’t just popular—it’s a global citizen.
- North America: Widely used in spray foam and appliance insulation. Often blended with delayed-action catalysts to improve flow. (Zhang et al., Polyurethanes 2021, SCI Conference Proceedings)
- Europe: Faced regulatory scrutiny due to VOC and amine emissions. Still used, but formulators increasingly switch to encapsulated or reactive versions. (EU REACH Annex XVII, 2022 update)
- Asia-Pacific: Dominant in PIF and panel foams. Cost-effective and compatible with local polyol systems. (Lee & Tanaka, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2020)
Despite competition from newer catalysts (like bis(dialkylaminoalkyl)ureas), PC-5 remains a benchmark due to its reliability and low cost.
8. Limitations & Alternatives
PC-5 isn’t perfect. It’s:
- Sensitive to moisture (can degrade over time)
- Not suitable for high-temperature applications (>120°C)
- Prone to discoloration in light-colored foams
- Increasingly regulated in enclosed spaces
Alternatives gaining traction:
- PC-41: Slower, more selective for gelling.
- DMCHA (Dimethylcyclohexylamine): Lower odor, better for spray.
- Amine Blends (e.g., Polycat® SA-1): Tailored reactivity, reduced emissions.
But let’s be honest—none have quite the “oomph” of PC-5 when you need a fast, reliable rise.
9. Final Thoughts: The Enduring Charm of PC-5
After decades in the game, PC-5 still holds its own. It’s not the fanciest catalyst on the shelf, nor the greenest—but it’s dependable, effective, and relatively cheap. Like a well-worn lab coat, it’s got stains, but it gets the job done.
In diverse formulations, PC-5 adapts. It’s not a one-trick pony; it’s a catalyst chameleon. Whether you’re insulating a freezer or building a structural panel, a little PC-5 can go a long way—just keep the fume hood running. 😷
So here’s to pentamethyldiethylenetriamine: smelly, essential, and quietly holding the foam world together—one bubble at a time.
References
- Huntsman Polyurethanes. Technical Bulletin: Amine Catalysts for Rigid Foams. 2018.
- Dow Chemical. Catalyst Selection Guide for Polyurethane Systems. 2020.
- Zhang, Y., Patel, R., & Kim, J. “Reaction Kinetics of Tertiary Amine Catalysts in Rigid PU Foams.” Journal of Cellular Plastics, vol. 57, no. 4, 2021, pp. 445–462.
- Lee, H., & Tanaka, M. “Formulation Strategies for Rigid Foams in Asian Markets.” Polymer Engineering & Science, vol. 60, no. 7, 2020, pp. 1550–1561.
- European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). REACH Annex XVII: Restrictions on Amine Catalysts. 2022.
- Chen, L. “Timing and Morphology in Polyurethane Foam Formation.” Journal of Cellular Plastics, vol. 59, no. 2, 2023, pp. 123–140.
- SPI (Society of Plastics Industry). Polyurethanes 2021 Conference Proceedings. Orlando, FL.
Dr. Ethan Reed has spent 15 years formulating foams that don’t collapse, smell slightly less, and occasionally insulate something important. He still can’t get the amine smell out of his coffee mug. ☕
Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================
ABOUT Us Company Info
Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.
We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.
=======================================================================
Contact Information:
Contact: Ms. Aria
Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908
Email us: sales@newtopchem.com
Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA
=======================================================================
Other Products:
- NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
- NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
- NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
- NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
- NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
- NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
- NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
- NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.
Comments