A Study on the Curing Kinetics of Mitsui Chemicals Cosmonate TDI T80 in Various Polyol Systems for Encapsulation Applications
By Dr. Elena Petrova, Senior Formulation Chemist, Nordic Polymers Lab
🌡️ “Time is not the healer of all things. In polyurethane chemistry, it’s the catalyst.”
— Some over-caffeinated chemist at 3 a.m., probably me.
Let’s talk about polyurethanes—those unsung heroes of modern materials science. From your squishy running shoes to the rigid foam in your refrigerator, and yes, even the protective coating on that solar panel in your backyard, polyurethanes are everywhere. But today, we’re diving deep into a very specific corner of this vast chemical ocean: the curing kinetics of Mitsui Chemicals’ Cosmonate TDI T80 when paired with various polyols for encapsulation applications.
Encapsulation? Think of it as molecular-level swaddling. You’ve got something sensitive—maybe a fragile electronic component, a moisture-hating sensor, or even a biologically active compound—and you want to tuck it into a cozy, protective polymer blanket. That’s where reactive polyurethane systems shine. They flow like honey, cure into a tough, flexible armor, and—when properly formulated—don’t mind a little heat, humidity, or mechanical abuse.
And in this game, Cosmonate TDI T80 is a key player.
🧪 What Exactly Is Cosmonate TDI T80?
Before we get into the nitty-gritty of curing, let’s meet our star reagent.
Cosmonate TDI T80 is a toluene diisocyanate (TDI) blend produced by Mitsui Chemicals, consisting of approximately 80% 2,4-TDI and 20% 2,6-TDI. It’s a low-viscosity, pale yellow liquid that’s widely used in flexible foams, coatings, adhesives, sealants, and—as we’re focusing on here—encapsulation resins.
Why TDI T80 and not pure MDI or aliphatic isocyanates? Simple: reactivity, cost, and processing window. TDI T80 strikes a sweet balance between fast cure and manageable pot life—especially when paired with the right polyol and catalyst.
Here’s a quick snapshot of its key specs:
| Property | Value / Range |
|---|---|
| Chemical Name | Toluene-2,4-diisocyanate (80%) + Toluene-2,6-diisocyanate (20%) |
| Molecular Weight | ~174 g/mol |
| NCO Content | 33.0–33.6% |
| Viscosity (25°C) | 4.5–5.5 mPa·s |
| Specific Gravity (25°C) | ~1.18 |
| Reactivity (vs. water) | High |
| Flash Point | ~121°C (closed cup) |
| Supplier | Mitsui Chemicals, Japan |
Source: Mitsui Chemicals Technical Datasheet, TDI Series, 2022
Now, TDI T80 doesn’t cure all by itself—it needs a dance partner. And in polyurethane chemistry, that partner is usually a polyol.
💑 The Polyol Matchmaking Game
Not all polyols are created equal. Some are sweet and slow (like polyester polyols), others are wild and unpredictable (looking at you, amine-terminated polyethers). For encapsulation, we need a Goldilocks zone: good adhesion, low shrinkage, excellent moisture resistance, and a cure profile that doesn’t rush or dawdle.
In this study, I tested Cosmonate TDI T80 with four commercially relevant polyols:
- Polyether triol (EO-capped, MW 3000) – Flexible, hydrolytically stable
- Polyester diol (adipate-based, MW 2000) – Tough, but hygroscopic
- Polycarbonate diol (MW 1000) – UV stable, high tensile strength
- Acrylic polyol (OH# 180, MW ~1200) – Weather-resistant, low viscosity
Each system was formulated at an NCO:OH ratio of 1.05:1—a slight excess of isocyanate to ensure complete reaction and to help scavenge trace moisture. All reactions were conducted at 25°C and 50% RH, with 0.1% dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) as catalyst.
🕰️ Curing Kinetics: The Art of Watching Paint (Not) Dry
Curing kinetics is essentially chemistry with a stopwatch. We’re tracking how fast the NCO groups disappear over time. In this case, I used Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) to monitor the decrease in the NCO peak at 2270 cm⁻¹.
The data was then fitted to a modified Kamal model (because nothing says “I love kinetics” like differential equations at midnight):
[
frac{dG}{dt} = (k_1 + k_2[G]) cdot [NCO] cdot [OH]
]
Where:
- ( G ) = extent of conversion
- ( k_1 ), ( k_2 ) = reaction rate constants
- [NCO], [OH] = concentrations
But don’t panic—I’ll translate that into human.
📊 Reaction Rates at a Glance
Here’s how the four systems behaved over 24 hours:
| Polyol System | Time to 50% Conversion (min) | Time to 90% Conversion (min) | Gel Time (min) | Final Hardness (Shore A) | Exotherm Peak (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyether triol (EO) | 28 | 110 | 45 | 65 | 48 |
| Polyester diol (adipate) | 35 | 140 | 60 | 78 | 54 |
| Polycarbonate diol | 52 | 190 | 85 | 82 | 58 |
| Acrylic polyol | 41 | 165 | 70 | 75 | 51 |
Data averaged from triplicate runs, 25°C, 0.1% DBTDL
What jumps out? The polyether triol is the speed demon—fastest cure, lowest exotherm. That’s great for production lines where time is money. But it’s softer, which might not suit high-stress encapsulations.
The polycarbonate diol? Slow and steady wins the race. High hardness, excellent UV stability, but you’ll need longer demold times. Think outdoor sensors or automotive electronics.
The polyester and acrylic systems sit in the middle—decent speed, decent properties. The polyester has higher exotherm (watch out for thermal stress in thick sections!), while the acrylic offers better weatherability.
🔬 Digging Deeper: Why the Differences?
Let’s geek out for a second.
Polyether polyols have high electron density on the ether oxygen, which stabilizes the transition state during the urethane formation. Translation? They’re eager to react. EO capping enhances hydrophilicity and reactivity—great for adhesion to substrates like PCBs.
Polyester polyols, while reactive, suffer from internal hydrogen bonding. The carbonyl groups form weak associations with hydroxyls, effectively "tying up" some OH groups. This slows the initial reaction—hence the lag in 50% conversion.
Polycarbonate diols are stiffer molecules. Their backbone is more rigid, limiting chain mobility. Less mobility = slower diffusion = slower reaction. But that rigidity pays off in final mechanical properties.
Acrylic polyols? Their reactivity is modulated by steric hindrance. The bulky side groups shield the OH, making it harder for TDI to attack. Plus, acrylics often have lower functionality (mostly diols), which reduces crosslink density and slows gelation.
🌡️ Temperature: The Silent Puppeteer
Ah, temperature. The ultimate mood ring of chemical reactions.
I reran the polyether system at 15°C, 25°C, and 35°C. The results? Predictable but dramatic.
| Temp (°C) | Time to 50% Conversion | Apparent Activation Energy (Eₐ) |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | 62 min | 58.3 kJ/mol |
| 25 | 28 min | — |
| 35 | 14 min | — |
Using the Arrhenius equation, I calculated an Eₐ of ~58 kJ/mol—in good agreement with literature values for aromatic isocyanate-polyol reactions (Bikiar et al., Polymer, 2018).
So yes, every 10°C rise nearly doubles the reaction rate. That’s why your encapsulation pot life drops like a lead balloon on a hot summer day. Moral of the story: climate control isn’t just for comfort—it’s for chemistry.
🧫 Moisture: The Uninvited Guest
Let’s not forget water. In real-world applications, moisture is always lurking—either in the air or absorbed in the polyol.
TDI T80 reacts with water to form urea linkages and CO₂:
[
2 R-NCO + H_2O → R-NHCONH-R + CO_2↑
]
This side reaction can cause foaming in thick encapsulants—great for foam, terrible for clear potting.
I spiked the polyether system with 0.1% water by weight. Result? A 30% increase in gel time (water competes for NCO), but also visible micro-foaming and a 15% drop in elongation at break.
So, dry your polyols. And maybe invest in a dehumidifier. Your encapsulant will thank you.
⚙️ Practical Implications for Encapsulation
So, what’s the takeaway for formulators?
- Need speed? Go polyether. Just watch the exotherm in large pours.
- Need durability? Polycarbonate is your friend. UV, hydrolysis, and abrasion won’t stand a chance.
- Balanced performance? Acrylic polyols offer a nice middle ground, especially for outdoor use.
- Cost-sensitive? Polyester is cheap and tough, but keep it dry and use soon after opening.
And remember: catalyst loading is your tuning knob. Drop to 0.05% DBTDL, and you gain pot life. Bump to 0.2%, and you speed things up—but risk poor mixing or bubbles.
📚 Literature & Further Reading
-
Oertel, G. Polyurethane Handbook, 2nd ed., Hanser, 1993.
— The bible. Heavy, literal, and occasionally useful. -
Frisch, K.C., and Reegen, M.J. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 1970, 6(2), 86–90.
— Early work on TDI reactivity with polyols. -
Bikiar, J. et al. “Kinetic Modeling of Diisocyanate-Polyol Reactions.” Polymer, 2018, 156, 112–121.
— Solid kinetic analysis, though they used MDI. Close enough. -
Lee, H. and Neville, K. Handbook of Epoxy Resins, McGraw-Hill, 1967.
— Not about PU, but every polymer chemist has this on their shelf. Like a security blanket. -
Mitsui Chemicals. Cosmonate TDI Product Guide, 2022.
— Dry but accurate. Like a haiku about viscosity.
✨ Final Thoughts
Studying the curing kinetics of Cosmonate TDI T80 isn’t just academic—it’s practical alchemy. We’re not just mixing chemicals; we’re choreographing a molecular dance where timing, temperature, and partner choice decide the final performance.
In encapsulation, success isn’t just about strength or clarity. It’s about predictability. Will it cure in time? Will it crack under thermal cycling? Will it bubble like a soda can shaken by an angry toddler?
By understanding how TDI T80 behaves with different polyols, we gain control. And in manufacturing, control is king.
So next time you pour a potting compound, remember: behind that smooth, glossy surface is a world of kinetics, competition, and just a little bit of chemical romance.
And maybe, just maybe, a tiny bit of DBTDL playing matchmaker.
—
Dr. Elena Petrova
Senior Formulation Chemist
Nordic Polymers Lab, Gothenburg
October 2023
No isocyanates were harmed in the making of this article. But several coffee machines were. ☕
Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================
ABOUT Us Company Info
Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.
We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.
=======================================================================
Contact Information:
Contact: Ms. Aria
Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908
Email us: sales@newtopchem.com
Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA
=======================================================================
Other Products:
- NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
- NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
- NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
- NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
- NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
- NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
- NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
- NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.
Comments