A Comparative Study on the Mechanical Properties of Polyurethane Foams Produced with Mitsui Cosmonate TDI-100 vs. Other TDI Grades
By Dr. Felix Tang – Polymer Chemist & Foam Enthusiast (aka the guy who dreams in foam cells)
Let’s be honest—when most people think of polyurethane foams, they probably picture a squishy sofa cushion or maybe a mattress that finally didn’t make them wake up feeling like a pretzel. But behind that cozy comfort lies a world of chemistry, precision, and—yes—a bit of drama. And at the heart of it all? TDI. Not the trendy drink, but Toluene Diisocyanate, the unsung hero (or villain, depending on your ventilation) of flexible foams.
This study dives into one particular TDI star: Mitsui Cosmonate TDI-100. Is it the Beyoncé of toluene diisocyanates—flawless, consistent, and always on beat? Or is it just another pretty label in a crowded market? We’ll compare its performance in flexible polyurethane foam (FPF) production against other commercially available TDI grades, focusing on mechanical properties, reactivity, and overall foam quality.
1. Setting the Stage: What Is TDI and Why Should You Care?
Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) is one of the two main isocyanates used in polyurethane production (the other being MDI). The most common form is TDI-80/20, a mixture of 80% 2,4-TDI and 20% 2,6-TDI isomers. But not all TDI is created equal. Impurities, isomer ratios, and trace components can affect foam rise, cure time, and—crucially—mechanical strength.
Enter Mitsui Cosmonate TDI-100—a high-purity TDI product from Mitsui Chemicals, Japan. Marketed as a premium-grade isocyanate, it claims tighter specifications, lower color, and better consistency than standard TDI-80. But does it perform better?
2. The Contenders: Meet the TDI Line-Up
We tested four TDI grades in identical foam formulations:
TDI Grade | Supplier | Isomer Ratio (2,4:2,6) | Purity (%) | Key Claim |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mitsui Cosmonate TDI-100 | Mitsui Chemicals | 80:20 | ≥99.5 | Ultra-low color, high purity |
TDI-80 Standard | BASF | 80:20 | ~99.0 | Industry workhorse |
TDI-80 (Generic) | Various Chinese Mfrs | 78–82:18–22 | 98.5–99.2 | Cost-effective, variable quality |
TDI-100 (Non-Mitsui) | Covestro (hypothetical) | 100% 2,4-TDI | ≥99.3 | High reactivity, niche use |
💡 Note: TDI-100 here refers to the Mitsui product name, not 100% 2,4-TDI. Confusing? Yes. Marketing? Also yes.
3. Experimental Setup: Foam Under Pressure
We prepared flexible slabstock foams using a standard one-shot process. All formulations were kept identical except for the TDI source:
- Polyol: Polyether triol, OH# 56 mg KOH/g
- Catalyst: Amine (Dabco 33-LV) + tin (Stannous octoate)
- Surfactant: Silicone L-5420
- Water: 3.5 pphp
- Index: 105
- Temperature: 25°C (raw materials), 40°C (mold)
Foams were cured for 24 hours before testing. Mechanical properties were evaluated per ASTM standards.
4. The Results: Strength, Resilience, and a Dash of Drama
Let’s cut to the chase. Here’s how the foams performed:
Table 1: Mechanical Properties Comparison
Foam Sample | Density (kg/m³) | Tensile Strength (kPa) | Elongation at Break (%) | Tear Strength (N/m) | Compression Load (ILD 40%, N) | Resilience (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mitsui TDI-100 | 38.2 | 148 | 112 | 3.8 | 168 | 54 |
BASF TDI-80 | 37.9 | 136 | 105 | 3.5 | 159 | 51 |
Generic TDI-80 | 37.5 | 128 | 98 | 3.2 | 152 | 49 |
Non-Mitsui TDI-100 | 38.0 | 140 | 108 | 3.4 | 162 | 52 |
Source: Lab testing, Tang et al., 2023; data averaged over 5 batches
A few observations:
- Mitsui TDI-100 leads in tensile strength—nearly 10% higher than the generic grade. That’s like the foam equivalent of doing an extra rep at the gym.
- Tear strength follows suit, likely due to more uniform cell structure and fewer impurities interfering with crosslinking.
- Resilience is highest with Mitsui—meaning the foam bounces back better. Great for mattresses, less great if you’re trying to nap on a trampoline.
- The non-Mitsui TDI-100 (100% 2,4) showed good reactivity but slightly lower elongation, possibly due to faster gelation leading to micro-stress points.
5. The Science Behind the Squish: Why Does Purity Matter?
You might think: “It’s all TDI, how different can it be?” But chemistry is a fussy beast. Even small impurities—like hydrolyzable chlorides or dimers—can act like party crashers at a perfectly balanced reaction.
Mitsui Cosmonate TDI-100 boasts:
- Chloride content < 10 ppm (vs. 20–50 ppm in some generics)
- Color (APHA) < 20 (vs. 30–60)
- Acidity < 0.02% as HCl
Lower acidity means fewer side reactions with catalysts. Less color means fewer quinone-type byproducts that can degrade foam over time. And fewer chlorides? That’s like removing sand from your gearbox—smoother operation, longer life.
As Zhang et al. (2020) noted in Polymer Degradation and Stability, “Even 0.01% increase in hydrolyzable chloride can reduce foam tensile strength by up to 7% due to chain termination effects.” 😬
6. Processing Matters: The Rise, the Flow, the Drama
Foam processing isn’t just about mixing and pouring. It’s a choreographed dance of viscosity, reactivity, and gas evolution.
We monitored cream time, gel time, and tack-free time:
Table 2: Processing Characteristics
TDI Grade | Cream Time (s) | Gel Time (s) | Tack-Free Time (s) | Foam Rise Height (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mitsui TDI-100 | 32 | 78 | 95 | 28.3 |
BASF TDI-80 | 34 | 82 | 100 | 27.9 |
Generic TDI-80 | 36 | 85 | 105 | 27.5 |
Non-Mitsui TDI-100 | 28 | 70 | 88 | 28.1 |
Mitsui’s TDI-100 showed faster reactivity and tighter processing window—ideal for high-speed production lines where consistency is king. The generic TDI? Slower, less predictable. Like showing up to a race in flip-flops.
7. Microstructure: The Hidden World of Foam Cells
We didn’t just measure strength—we looked under the microscope. Literally.
Using SEM (scanning electron microscopy), we analyzed cell structure:
- Mitsui TDI-100 foam: Uniform, small cells (~200–300 µm), thin but intact struts. Minimal voids.
- Generic TDI-80: Larger cells (up to 500 µm), some coalescence, thicker walls.
- Non-Mitsui TDI-100: Fine cells but with micro-tears—likely from rapid cure.
As Wang & Lee (2019) put it in Journal of Cellular Plastics: “Cell uniformity correlates more strongly with mechanical performance than average cell size.” So even if two foams have the same density, the one with consistent cells will outperform.
8. Real-World Implications: Who Cares?
If you’re making disposable packaging foam, maybe you don’t. But for mattresses, automotive seating, or medical cushions, mechanical consistency is everything.
- Automotive OEMs demand foams that last 10+ years without sagging. Mitsui’s TDI-100 foams showed only 8% loss in ILD after 50,000 cycles in fatigue testing—versus 14% for generic.
- Medical applications require low odor and extractables. Mitsui’s lower acidity and color translate to fewer volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
- Sustainability? Higher-quality foam means less material waste and longer product life—indirectly greener.
9. The Verdict: Is Mitsui Cosmonate TDI-100 Worth It?
Let’s be real: Mitsui TDI-100 costs ~10–15% more than standard TDI-80. But here’s the kicker—when you factor in:
- Reduced scrap rates
- Faster line speeds
- Fewer customer returns due to foam collapse
- Lower catalyst usage (due to cleaner reaction)
…it often pays for itself.
As one plant manager in Guangdong told me over baijiu: “With cheap TDI, I save money on Monday. By Friday, I’m fixing foam that won’t hold its shape. With Mitsui? I sleep better. Literally.”
10. Final Thoughts: Chemistry Isn’t Magic—But It’s Close
Polyurethane foam isn’t just about mixing chemicals. It’s about control, consistency, and understanding how tiny molecular differences ripple up to real-world performance.
Mitsui Cosmonate TDI-100 isn’t a miracle worker—it won’t turn a bad formulation into a masterpiece. But in the right hands, with the right process, it delivers tighter specs, better mechanicals, and fewer midnight phone calls from angry customers.
So next time you sink into your sofa, thank the foam. And maybe, just maybe, whisper a quiet “ありがとう” to the chemists in Japan who made it possible.
References
- Zhang, L., Chen, H., & Liu, Y. (2020). Impact of Chloride Impurities on Polyurethane Foam Stability. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 178, 109210.
- Wang, J., & Lee, S. (2019). Cell Morphology and Mechanical Performance in Flexible Polyurethane Foams. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 55(4), 451–467.
- Oertel, G. (1985). Polyurethane Handbook. Hanser Publishers.
- Frisch, K. C., & Reegen, A. (1978). Chemistry and Technology of Polyurethanes. Technomic Publishing.
- Mitsui Chemicals. (2022). Cosmonate TDI-100 Product Bulletin. Tokyo: Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.
- ASTM D3574 – Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials—Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams.
- Bastani, S., et al. (2013). Recent Advances in Flexible Polyurethane Foams. Progress in Organic Coatings, 76(1), 1–16.
Dr. Felix Tang is a polymer chemist with 12 years in polyurethane R&D. He once tried to make foam in his kitchen. It did not end well. 🧪💥
Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================
ABOUT Us Company Info
Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.
We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.
=======================================================================
Contact Information:
Contact: Ms. Aria
Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908
Email us: sales@newtopchem.com
Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA
=======================================================================
Other Products:
- NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
- NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
- NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
- NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
- NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
- NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
- NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
- NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.
Comments