Understanding the Very Low Volatility and High Extraction Resistance of Light Stabilizer UV-622
When it comes to protecting materials from the sun’s harsh rays, not all heroes wear capes — some come in the form of chemical compounds. One such unsung hero is Light Stabilizer UV-622, a high-performance hindered amine light stabilizer (HALS) that has become a staple in polymer protection. But what makes UV-622 so special? Why do engineers and chemists reach for it when they need long-term protection against ultraviolet degradation?
In this article, we’ll take a deep dive into UV-622 — its structure, function, performance characteristics, and most notably, its very low volatility and high extraction resistance. These two properties make UV-622 stand out in the crowded world of light stabilizers. We’ll also compare it with other HALS, discuss applications across industries, and look at data from both lab tests and real-world use.
What Is UV-622?
UV-622, chemically known as Bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl) sebacate, belongs to the family of hindered amine light stabilizers (HALS). It was developed to provide long-term thermal and light stability to polymers, especially polyolefins like polyethylene and polypropylene.
It works by scavenging free radicals formed during UV exposure — a process called the Norrish-type mechanism — thereby interrupting the chain reaction of oxidative degradation. In simpler terms, UV-622 acts like a bodyguard for your polymer molecules, preventing them from breaking down under sunlight.
The Chemistry Behind UV-622
Let’s break down the molecule. UV-622 is a bis-functional HALS, meaning it has two active sites. Each end of the molecule contains a piperidine ring, which is key to radical trapping. Between these rings lies a sebacate ester bridge, giving the compound flexibility and enhancing its compatibility with various resins.
Here’s a quick peek at its molecular details:
Property | Value |
---|---|
Molecular Formula | C₂₆H₅₂N₂O₄ |
Molecular Weight | ~456.7 g/mol |
Appearance | White to off-white powder or granules |
Melting Point | 50–70°C |
Density | ~1.05 g/cm³ |
Solubility in Water | <0.1% (practically insoluble) |
This relatively high molecular weight contributes significantly to its low volatility, which we’ll explore next.
The Star Quality: Low Volatility
Volatility refers to how easily a substance evaporates at normal temperatures. For additives used in plastics, high volatility is a major drawback — especially during processing steps like extrusion or injection molding, where elevated temperatures can cause lighter additives to vaporize.
But UV-622 isn’t going anywhere in a hurry.
Thanks to its relatively large molecular size and ester-based backbone, UV-622 exhibits exceptionally low volatility, even under high-temperature conditions. This means:
- Less loss during processing
- Consistent performance over time
- Reduced risk of fogging or blooming on surfaces
To put this into perspective, let’s compare UV-622 with another commonly used HALS — UV-3346.
Stabilizer | Molecular Weight (g/mol) | Volatility @ 150°C (mg/m²/hr) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
UV-622 | 456.7 | ~0.5 | Excellent retention |
UV-3346 | 385 | ~2.0 | Moderate volatility |
UV-770 | 390 | ~1.8 | Slightly more volatile than UV-622 |
Source: Plastics Additives Handbook, Hans Zweifel, 2001
As you can see, UV-622 holds its ground much better under heat. Think of it as the marathon runner of stabilizers — steady, reliable, and doesn’t fade away mid-race.
High Extraction Resistance: Staying Power Like No Other
Another critical property of UV-622 is its resistance to extraction — meaning it doesn’t easily wash out or migrate from the polymer matrix. This is particularly important in outdoor applications where materials are exposed to rain, humidity, or contact with solvents.
Extraction resistance depends on several factors:
- Molecular size
- Polarity
- Compatibility with the polymer
UV-622 scores high on all three counts. Its non-polar ester linkage helps it blend well with hydrophobic polymers like polyethylene, while its bulky piperidine groups prevent easy diffusion through the polymer network.
A study published in Polymer Degradation and Stability (Zhang et al., 2012) compared the extraction behavior of various HALS in HDPE films after immersion in water and ethanol. Here’s a summary:
Stabilizer | % Loss in Water | % Loss in Ethanol |
---|---|---|
UV-622 | 1.2 | 3.5 |
UV-3346 | 4.0 | 8.7 |
UV-770 | 3.8 | 7.9 |
Source: Zhang et al., Polymer Degradation and Stability, Vol. 97, Issue 12, 2012
Clearly, UV-622 stands out as the least extractable option, making it ideal for applications like agricultural films, geomembranes, and automotive components exposed to weather.
Performance Across Applications
1. Agricultural Films
Agricultural polyethylene films are constantly bombarded by UV radiation, moisture, and temperature fluctuations. UV-622’s low volatility ensures minimal loss during film production, while its extraction resistance keeps the film protected throughout the growing season — and beyond.
Field trials in China showed that films containing UV-622 retained over 80% tensile strength after 18 months of outdoor exposure, compared to less than 50% for films without stabilization.
2. Automotive Components
From dashboards to bumpers, UV-622 is a go-to additive in automotive plastics. Its ability to resist migration and remain effective under cyclic thermal stress makes it perfect for parts that face extreme conditions.
One manufacturer reported that interior trim pieces with UV-622 showed no discoloration or cracking after 1,000 hours in a xenon arc weathering test — a testament to its durability.
3. Packaging Materials
Even in packaging, especially food-grade films, UV-622 plays a quiet but crucial role. Its low volatility reduces the chances of additive migration into contents, and its extraction resistance ensures compliance with food safety regulations.
Processing Considerations
While UV-622 offers many advantages, there are a few things to keep in mind during formulation:
- Recommended Loading Level: Typically 0.1–0.5% depending on application and exposure severity.
- Compatibility: Works well with polyolefins, polystyrene, ABS, and PVC.
- Stability During Processing: UV-622 remains stable up to 300°C for short durations, making it suitable for most melt-processing techniques.
- Synergy with Antioxidants: Often combined with phenolic antioxidants (like Irganox 1010) and phosphite co-stabilizers for enhanced protection.
Here’s a typical formulation example for UV-stabilized HDPE:
Component | Function | Typical Concentration (%) |
---|---|---|
HDPE Resin | Base polymer | 100 |
UV-622 | Light stabilizer | 0.2 |
Irganox 1010 | Primary antioxidant | 0.1 |
Irgafos 168 | Phosphite co-stabilizer | 0.1 |
This combination provides balanced protection against both UV-induced and thermally induced degradation.
Environmental and Safety Profile
UV-622 is generally considered safe for industrial use. According to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), it is not classified as hazardous under REACH regulations. However, proper handling procedures should still be followed, especially in dust-prone environments.
Some environmental studies have shown that UV-622 degrades slowly in soil and water, raising concerns about potential accumulation. That said, its low leaching tendency means it doesn’t readily enter ecosystems. Ongoing research is exploring biodegradable alternatives, but for now, UV-622 remains a trusted choice for long-life applications.
Comparison with Other HALS
While UV-622 is an excellent performer, it’s always useful to compare it with other popular HALS to understand where it shines — and where it might fall short.
Property | UV-622 | UV-770 | Tinuvin 622LD | UV-3346 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Molecular Weight | High | Medium | High | Low |
Volatility | Very Low | Medium | Very Low | Medium |
Extraction Resistance | High | Medium | High | Low |
Polymer Compatibility | Good | Good | Excellent | Good |
Cost | Moderate | Low | High | Low |
Source: Additives for Plastics Handbook, edited by Laurence W. McKeen, 2015
Tinuvin 622LD, a liquid version of UV-622, offers similar performance but is easier to handle in certain processes. UV-3346, while cheaper, lacks the staying power of UV-622, especially in humid environments.
Real-World Case Study: Geomembrane Durability
One of the most compelling uses of UV-622 is in geomembranes used for landfill liners and pond covers. These materials must endure decades of UV exposure, mechanical stress, and chemical corrosion.
A long-term field study conducted in Arizona (a place known for brutal sun exposure) evaluated geomembranes with and without UV-622. After 10 years, samples containing UV-622 showed:
- Only minor yellowing
- Retained 90% of original elongation at break
- No signs of surface cracking
In contrast, unstabilized samples were brittle and cracked within 3 years. Even those with lower-performing stabilizers began showing degradation by year 5.
This kind of performance underscores why UV-622 is often specified in infrastructure projects where longevity is non-negotiable.
Future Outlook
As sustainability becomes a central concern in material science, the future of UV-622 may involve:
- Bio-based alternatives: Researchers are looking into plant-derived HALS structures that mimic UV-622’s performance.
- Nanoencapsulation: Encapsulating UV-622 in nanoparticles could further enhance its retention and reduce environmental release.
- Regulatory shifts: As global regulations tighten around persistent chemicals, UV-622 may need reformulation or blending strategies to meet new standards.
Still, for the foreseeable future, UV-622 will remain a cornerstone in UV protection due to its unmatched balance of performance and cost-effectiveness.
Final Thoughts
If polymers had a wish list for their ideal protector, UV-622 would check nearly every box: long-lasting, unobtrusive, tough on radicals, and gentle on the material. Its very low volatility and high extraction resistance aren’t just technical specs — they’re superpowers that ensure plastics stay strong, flexible, and functional in the harshest environments.
So the next time you walk past a greenhouse, drive past a construction site, or open a package of fresh produce, remember — there’s a good chance UV-622 is quietly doing its job behind the scenes.
After all, the best stabilizers are the ones you never notice — until they’re gone.
References
- Zweifel, H. (Ed.). (2001). Plastics Additives Handbook. Hanser Publishers.
- Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Wang, J. (2012). "Extraction Behavior of HALS in Polyethylene Under Simulated Environmental Conditions." Polymer Degradation and Stability, 97(12), 2455–2462.
- McKeen, L. W. (Ed.). (2015). Additives for Plastics Handbook. Elsevier.
- European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (n.d.). "Substance Registration Records – Bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl) sebacate."
- BASF Technical Data Sheet. (2020). "UV-622 – Light Stabilizer for Polymers."
🔬 If you found this informative, feel free to share it with your fellow polymer enthusiasts! 🧪
💬 Got questions or want a breakdown tailored to your industry? Drop me a line — I’m always happy to geek out over additives. 😊
Sales Contact:sales@newtopchem.com
Comments