Understanding the excellent extraction resistance and thermal stability of Light Stabilizer UV-783

admin news1Read

Understanding the Excellent Extraction Resistance and Thermal Stability of Light Stabilizer UV-783


When it comes to protecting materials from the relentless assault of sunlight, not all heroes wear capes — some come in the form of chemical compounds. One such unsung hero is Light Stabilizer UV-783, a high-performance hindered amine light stabilizer (HALS) that plays a crucial role in prolonging the lifespan of polymers exposed to ultraviolet radiation. But what makes UV-783 stand out in a crowded field of light stabilizers? The answer lies in two key characteristics: its exceptional extraction resistance and outstanding thermal stability.

In this article, we’ll take a deep dive into these properties, explore why they matter, and understand how UV-783 manages to deliver both without compromising on performance. We’ll also look at its technical parameters, compare it with other common HALS, and back our claims with scientific literature from around the globe.

Let’s start by setting the stage.


A Brief Introduction to Light Stabilizers

Polymers, while incredibly versatile and widely used in everything from packaging to automotive parts, have one major Achilles’ heel: UV degradation. When exposed to sunlight, especially the UV component, many plastics begin to break down through a process called photooxidation. This leads to discoloration, cracking, loss of mechanical strength, and eventually, failure of the material.

Enter light stabilizers — additives designed to slow or prevent this degradation. Among them, Hindered Amine Light Stabilizers (HALS) are arguably the most effective. They work by scavenging free radicals formed during UV exposure, effectively "mopping up" the reactive species before they can wreak havoc on polymer chains.

Now, while many HALS offer good protection, not all are created equal. Some are easily washed away by solvents or water, others degrade under heat. UV-783, however, seems to strike an almost perfect balance between durability and performance.


What Is UV-783?

UV-783, chemically known as Bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl) sebacate, is a bis-functional HALS commonly used in polyolefins, engineering plastics, and coatings. Its molecular structure allows for dual-point stabilization, which enhances its efficiency. It’s particularly favored in applications where long-term outdoor exposure is expected — think agricultural films, automotive components, and industrial coatings.

But here’s the kicker: unlike many of its cousins in the HALS family, UV-783 doesn’t throw in the towel when things get hot or wet. In fact, it thrives.


Why Extraction Resistance Matters

Extraction resistance refers to a compound’s ability to remain within the polymer matrix even when exposed to external agents like water, solvents, or oils. For a light stabilizer, being washed out means being rendered useless — no matter how effective it is, if it leaches out, it can’t protect the polymer anymore.

This is especially critical in applications like:

  • Agricultural films: frequently exposed to rain and irrigation.
  • Automotive interiors: subjected to cleaning agents and temperature fluctuations.
  • Marine coatings: constantly in contact with seawater.

So how does UV-783 fare in this department?

Property UV-783 Typical HALS (e.g., UV-3346)
Water Extraction Loss (%) < 0.5% ~1.5–3%
Solvent Extraction Loss (%) < 1% ~3–5%
Oil Extraction Loss (%) < 2% ~4–6%

As shown above, UV-783 demonstrates significantly lower extraction losses across various media. This isn’t just due to luck — it’s built into its molecular architecture.

The long aliphatic chain (sebacic acid backbone) increases its compatibility with nonpolar polymers like polyethylene and polypropylene, anchoring it more firmly within the matrix. Additionally, the bulky piperidine rings act as a shield, making it harder for solvent molecules to access and pull the stabilizer out.

According to a study published in Polymer Degradation and Stability (Zhang et al., 2019), UV-783 showed only minimal migration even after 1,000 hours of immersion in water at 70°C — a condition far harsher than most real-world scenarios.


Thermal Stability: Standing Tall Under Heat

Thermal stability is another crucial parameter, especially for polymers processed at high temperatures or used in environments where heat is a constant companion. Many HALS tend to decompose or volatilize when exposed to temperatures above 200°C, which can be problematic during processing or in end-use conditions.

UV-783, however, laughs in the face of heat.

Here’s a quick comparison:

Parameter UV-783 UV-622 UV-3346
Onset Decomposition Temp (°C) 270 220 210
Volatility at 200°C (mg/kg) < 5 ~15 ~25
Retention After 24h at 180°C (%) >95% ~75% ~60%

From this table, it’s clear that UV-783 maintains its integrity much better under high-temperature conditions. This is partly because of its high molecular weight (around 529 g/mol), which reduces volatility, and partly due to the steric hindrance provided by the tetramethyl groups on the piperidine rings.

A paper by Liu et al. (2020) in the Journal of Applied Polymer Science found that UV-783 retained nearly all of its stabilizing activity after melt processing at 240°C — a temperature at which several other HALS had already begun to degrade.

This makes UV-783 an ideal candidate for engineering plastics like nylon and PBT, which are often molded or extruded at elevated temperatures.


UV Protection Efficiency: Still Got Game

Of course, none of this would matter if UV-783 sacrificed its primary function — UV protection — in the name of stability. Fortunately, it hasn’t.

In accelerated weathering tests conducted according to ASTM G154, UV-783 demonstrated excellent performance in preserving the tensile strength and color stability of polypropylene sheets after 2,000 hours of UV exposure.

Test Duration Tensile Strength Retention (%) Color Change (ΔE)
Control (No Stabilizer) ~30% >15
With UV-783 ~85% < 2
With UV-622 ~75% ~3

These results show that UV-783 not only protects against physical degradation but also helps maintain aesthetic qualities — a major plus in consumer-facing applications.

Moreover, studies have shown that UV-783 works synergistically with other antioxidants, such as phosphites and phenolic antioxidants, enhancing overall stabilization systems.


Applications Where UV-783 Shines Brightest

Thanks to its balanced profile of low volatility, high extraction resistance, and superb thermal stability, UV-783 finds use in a wide range of industries:

1. Agriculture

Greenhouse films, silage wraps, and mulch films require long-term UV protection and resistance to environmental washout. UV-783 excels here due to its low extraction loss and sustained performance.

2. Automotive

Interior and exterior plastic parts — bumpers, side mirrors, dashboards — need to withstand extreme temperature variations and repeated cleaning. UV-783 ensures these parts don’t fade or crack prematurely.

3. Construction & Infrastructure

Pipes, geomembranes, and roofing materials benefit from UV-783’s ability to endure both sun and soil moisture over decades.

4. Consumer Goods

Toys, garden furniture, and outdoor equipment made from polyolefins stay vibrant and durable longer with UV-783 in the mix.


Comparison with Other HALS

Let’s put UV-783 head-to-head with some of its most commonly used counterparts:

Feature UV-783 UV-622 Tinuvin 770 Chimassorb 944
Molecular Weight ~529 ~500 ~520 ~1,000+
Volatility Low Moderate Moderate Very Low
Extraction Resistance High Moderate Moderate High
Thermal Stability Excellent Good Fair Excellent
Cost Medium Low Medium High
Recommended Use Polyolefins, Engineering Plastics General Purpose Paints, Coatings High-Temp Applications

What’s interesting is that while products like Chimassorb 944 may offer higher molecular weight and even better thermal stability, they’re also significantly more expensive and less compatible with certain resins. UV-783 strikes a middle ground — offering robust performance without breaking the bank.


Dosage Recommendations and Processing Tips

Getting the most out of UV-783 requires using the right dosage and incorporating it properly during processing.

Material Type Recommended Dosage (phr) Notes
Polyethylene (PE) 0.2–0.5 Works well with pigments
Polypropylene (PP) 0.3–0.6 Especially effective in thin films
Nylon 0.3–0.8 Ideal for high-temp molding
TPO 0.2–0.4 Synergistic with antioxidants
Coatings 0.5–1.0 Better retention in solvent-based systems

It’s generally recommended to add UV-783 during the compounding stage, either via masterbatch or direct addition, to ensure uniform dispersion. Avoid excessive shear, as this can lead to premature decomposition.


Environmental and Safety Considerations

Safety is always a concern when dealing with chemical additives. According to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), UV-783 is not classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic to reproduction. It has low acute toxicity and is considered safe for both workers and end-users.

Environmental impact assessments also suggest that UV-783 poses minimal risk to aquatic life due to its low water solubility and tendency to bind tightly to soil particles. That said, proper disposal and recycling practices should still be followed to minimize ecological footprint.


Conclusion: UV-783 — The Balanced Performer

In the world of light stabilizers, UV-783 stands out not because it’s the best at one thing, but because it’s good at almost everything. It doesn’t compromise on UV protection, yet it stays put when other stabilizers might flee. It laughs off heat and humidity, and still manages to play nice with other additives.

Whether you’re designing a greenhouse film that needs to last five years or a car bumper that must survive both the Arizona sun and the Michigan winter, UV-783 is a reliable ally.

So next time you admire a plastic chair that hasn’t faded after a summer outdoors, or a car part that looks fresh after a decade on the road, tip your hat to UV-783 — the quiet guardian of polymers everywhere.


References

  1. Zhang, Y., Wang, L., & Chen, H. (2019). Comparative Study on Extraction Resistance of HALS in Polyolefin Films. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 167, 123–131.

  2. Liu, J., Zhao, M., & Sun, Q. (2020). Thermal Stability and Performance Evaluation of UV-783 in High-Temperature Polymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 137(15), 48672.

  3. Smith, R. & Patel, N. (2018). Advances in Light Stabilization Technology. Progress in Polymer Science, 85, 45–67.

  4. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (2021). Substance Registration Dossier: Bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl) Sebacate. Helsinki, Finland.

  5. ISO/TR 10358:1994. Plastics – Determination of extractables from polymeric materials.

  6. ASTM G154-16. Standard Practice for Operating Fluorescent Ultraviolet (UV) Lamp Apparatus for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials.

  7. Beyer, G. & Levchik, S. (2003). Flame Retardancy of Polymeric Materials. CRC Press.

  8. Nguyen, T., Chin, J. W., & Byrd, E. (2001). Weathering of Polymers: Testing and Degradation Mechanisms. ACS Symposium Series, 793, 12–25.

  9. Takamura, K., Yamamoto, M., & Sato, H. (2017). Long-term Durability of Stabilized Polyolefins in Agricultural Applications. Journal of Polymer Research, 24(8), 145.

  10. Kim, J. H., Park, S. Y., & Lee, C. H. (2015). Migration Behavior of HALS in Automotive Plastic Components. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 162, 501–508.


If you’ve made it this far, congratulations! You now know more about UV-783 than most people in the polymer industry 🧪🎉. Whether you’re a researcher, engineer, or just someone curious about how plastics survive the elements, we hope this guide has been both informative and enjoyable. Until next time — keep those polymers protected!

Sales Contact:sales@newtopchem.com

admin
  • by Published on 2025-06-26 17:42:27
  • Reprinted with permission:https://www.morpholine.cc/29151.html
Comments  0  Guest  0