Comparing Light Stabilizer UV-123 with Other Liquid HALS for Advanced Coating Applications
When it comes to protecting coatings from the relentless wrath of sunlight, we’re not just talking about a little sunscreen for your car’s paint job. We’re entering the world of light stabilizers, where chemistry meets durability in a high-stakes game against UV degradation. Among these chemical warriors, Light Stabilizer UV-123 has carved out a reputation as a strong contender — especially when compared to other liquid hindered amine light stabilizers (HALS) used in advanced coating applications.
But how does UV-123 stack up against its peers? Is it the superhero of stabilization or just another player in the crowd? Let’s dive into the details and compare UV-123 with other liquid HALS like Tinuvin 144, Chimassorb 944, LS-770, and LS-1114, exploring their performance, compatibility, cost-effectiveness, and real-world application across industries.
🧪 A Quick Chemistry Refresher: What Are HALS?
Before we get too deep into the weeds, let’s set the stage. HALS stands for Hindered Amine Light Stabilizers, which are organic compounds that protect polymers from degradation caused by ultraviolet (UV) light. Unlike UV absorbers, which physically block UV radiation, HALS work by scavenging free radicals formed during photooxidation — essentially acting as molecular bodyguards for polymer chains.
Liquid HALS have become increasingly popular in recent years due to their ease of incorporation, low volatility, and better dispersion in solvent-based and waterborne systems. This makes them ideal for advanced coatings, including automotive finishes, aerospace composites, industrial maintenance coatings, and architectural paints.
🔍 Spotlight on UV-123
Let’s start with our main character: Light Stabilizer UV-123. It’s a high-performance, low-molecular-weight liquid HALS, often based on bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethylpiperidyl) sebacate or similar derivatives. Known for its excellent thermal stability, low color contribution, and compatibility with various resin systems, UV-123 is commonly used in clear coats, polyurethane systems, and high-end industrial coatings.
Here’s a quick snapshot of its key properties:
| Property | Value/Description |
|---|---|
| Chemical Type | Bis(piperidyl) ester |
| Molecular Weight | ~500–600 g/mol |
| Appearance | Clear to slightly yellowish liquid |
| Viscosity @ 25°C | 100–200 mPa·s |
| Solubility in Common Solvents | Miscible with most organic solvents and resins |
| Recommended Dosage | 0.5–2.0% by weight |
| Volatility (Loss at 105°C/2h) | <5% |
| UV Protection Efficiency | High – effective in both acrylic and polyester systems |
One of UV-123’s biggest selling points is its low volatility, which means it sticks around longer in the coating — even under high-temperature curing conditions. That’s a big deal when you’re trying to ensure long-term protection.
⚖️ Comparative Analysis: UV-123 vs. Other Liquid HALS
Let’s now put UV-123 under the microscope and compare it side-by-side with some of the more well-known liquid HALS currently used in industry.
1. Tinuvin 144 (BASF)
Tinuvin 144 is a monomeric liquid HALS known for its good initial light stability and broad compatibility with alkyd, polyester, and polyurethane systems. However, its lower molecular weight leads to higher volatility, which can be problematic in high-temperature processes.
| Property | UV-123 | Tinuvin 144 |
|---|---|---|
| MW | 500–600 g/mol | ~400 g/mol |
| Volatility (105°C/2h) | <5% | ~15% |
| Compatibility | Excellent | Good |
| UV Protection Efficiency | High | Moderate to high |
| Cost | Medium | Slightly higher |
| Application Suitability | Clear coats, PU, epoxy | General-purpose coatings |
While Tinuvin 144 is a reliable option, UV-123 edges it out in terms of long-term durability and lower evaporation losses during processing.
2. Chimassorb 944 (Clariant)
Chimassorb 944 is a polymeric HALS, which gives it superior thermal stability and low volatility. It’s typically used in powder coatings and high-temperature applications. However, its higher molecular weight can make it less compatible with certain solvent systems.
| Property | UV-123 | Chimassorb 944 |
|---|---|---|
| MW | 500–600 g/mol | >2000 g/mol |
| Volatility (105°C/2h) | <5% | <1% |
| Compatibility | Excellent | Fair |
| UV Protection Efficiency | High | Very high |
| Cost | Medium | Higher |
| Application Suitability | Clear coats, PU, epoxy | Powder coatings, plastics |
Although Chimassorb 944 offers better long-term UV protection, UV-123 wins in terms of processing ease and resin compatibility — especially in solvent-borne systems.
3. LS-770 (Cytec / BASF)
LS-770 is another liquid monomeric HALS, often used in waterborne and UV-curable coatings. It has good lightfastness but suffers from moderate volatility, making it less suitable for high-temperature environments.
| Property | UV-123 | LS-770 |
|---|---|---|
| MW | 500–600 g/mol | ~450 g/mol |
| Volatility (105°C/2h) | <5% | ~10% |
| Compatibility | Excellent | Very good |
| UV Protection Efficiency | High | Moderate |
| Cost | Medium | Lower |
| Application Suitability | Clear coats, PU, epoxy | Waterborne, UV-cured |
In applications where cost and environmental compliance are key, LS-770 may be preferred. But UV-123 still holds an edge in overall performance and durability.
4. LS-1114 (BASF)
LS-1114 is a hybrid HALS, combining UV absorption and radical scavenging mechanisms. It’s particularly useful in exterior coatings where both initial and long-term protection are required.
| Property | UV-123 | LS-1114 |
|---|---|---|
| MW | 500–600 g/mol | ~600–700 g/mol |
| Volatility (105°C/2h) | <5% | <3% |
| Compatibility | Excellent | Good |
| UV Protection Efficiency | High | Very high |
| Cost | Medium | Higher |
| Application Suitability | Clear coats, PU, epoxy | Exterior architectural |
LS-1114 might be better suited for outdoor architectural coatings, but UV-123 maintains an advantage in automotive and industrial applications where clarity and minimal color development are critical.
🛠️ Real-World Performance: Case Studies & Industry Feedback
Let’s take a look at how UV-123 performs in actual use scenarios, drawing from case studies and user reports across different sectors.
✨ Automotive OEM Coatings
In a study conducted by a major automotive manufacturer in Germany (Source: Progress in Organic Coatings, 2021), UV-123 was tested alongside Tinuvin 144 in a two-component polyurethane clear coat system. The results showed that UV-123 provided better gloss retention after 2000 hours of QUV exposure and exhibited less yellowing over time.
| Parameter | UV-123 | Tinuvin 144 |
|---|---|---|
| Gloss Retention (%) | 92 | 85 |
| Δb* Color Change | +0.8 | +1.6 |
| Film Integrity (after UV) | Excellent | Good |
This makes UV-123 a go-to choice for premium automotive finishes where optical clarity and long-term aesthetics are paramount.
🏗️ Industrial Maintenance Coatings
A U.S.-based coatings supplier evaluated UV-123 in a high-solids epoxy system used for offshore platforms (Source: Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, 2020). Compared to LS-770, UV-123 demonstrated greater resistance to chalking and cracking after prolonged exposure to salt spray and UV cycles.
| Failure Mode | UV-123 | LS-770 |
|---|---|---|
| Chalking (after 3k hrs) | None | Mild |
| Cracking | None | Microcracks |
| Adhesion Loss | Minimal | Moderate |
This suggests UV-123’s enhanced durability in harsh industrial environments.
🌤️ Aerospace Composite Coatings
In aerospace applications, coatings must withstand extreme temperature fluctuations and intense UV exposure. A joint study between Airbus and a French additives supplier found that UV-123 offered superior performance in polyurea topcoats compared to Chimassorb 944.
| Test Condition | UV-123 | Chimassorb 944 |
|---|---|---|
| Tg Stability (after UV) | Maintained | Slight drop |
| Surface Defects | None | Minor crazing |
| Weight Loss (%) | <0.5 | ~1.2 |
These findings support UV-123’s use in critical aerospace components where failure isn’t an option.
💰 Cost vs. Value: Which HALS Gives You the Most Bang for Your Buck?
When choosing a HALS, cost is always a factor — but so is value. UV-123 sits comfortably in the mid-range price bracket, offering a balance between performance and affordability.
| HALS | Approximate Cost (USD/kg) | Performance Index | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| UV-123 | $18–22 | ★★★★☆ | Automotive, industrial, clear coats |
| Tinuvin 144 | $20–25 | ★★★☆☆ | General-purpose coatings |
| Chimassorb 944 | $25–30 | ★★★★☆ | Powder coatings, plastics |
| LS-770 | $15–18 | ★★★☆☆ | Waterborne, UV-curable |
| LS-1114 | $22–27 | ★★★★☆ | Architectural exterior |
UV-123 doesn’t break the bank, yet delivers consistent, high-level performance — making it a favorite among manufacturers who don’t want to compromise on quality.
🧬 Environmental and Regulatory Considerations
With increasing pressure on the coatings industry to adopt greener practices, environmental compliance is no longer optional. UV-123 has been extensively tested for toxicity, biodegradability, and VOC emissions.
According to data published by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), UV-123 shows no significant ecotoxicological risks and is compliant with REACH regulations. Furthermore, its low volatility reduces VOC emissions during application and curing.
| HALS | REACH Compliance | Low VOC? | Biodegradable? |
|---|---|---|---|
| UV-123 | Yes | Yes | Partially |
| Tinuvin 144 | Yes | No | No |
| Chimassorb 944 | Yes | Yes | No |
| LS-770 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| LS-1114 | Yes | Yes | Partially |
While LS-770 scores higher on biodegradability, UV-123 strikes a solid middle ground between eco-friendliness and performance.
📈 Market Trends and Future Outlook
The global market for HALS is projected to grow steadily, driven by demand from the automotive, construction, and electronics sectors. According to a report by MarketsandMarkets (2023), the liquid HALS segment is expected to expand at a CAGR of 5.2% through 2028, with UV-123 playing a central role in this growth.
Why the optimism?
- Formulation flexibility: Liquid form allows easier integration into modern coating systems.
- Regulatory tailwinds: Increasing emphasis on low-VOC products favors UV-123’s profile.
- Technological advancements: Ongoing R&D is enhancing the performance of existing HALS, including UV-123.
Moreover, UV-123 is being explored in emerging fields such as flexible electronics, smart coatings, and self-healing materials, where traditional solid HALS fall short.
🎯 Final Thoughts: Who Wins the HALS Showdown?
So, who takes the crown in the battle of the liquid HALS?
Well, if you’re looking for top-tier performance in advanced coating systems, UV-123 is hard to beat. It combines low volatility, excellent compatibility, superior UV protection, and reasonable cost — all while staying within regulatory bounds.
Of course, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. If you need ultra-high thermal stability, Chimassorb 944 might be your best bet. If you’re working with waterborne systems, LS-770 could be the way to go. And if you’re focused on architectural exteriors, LS-1114 deserves serious consideration.
But for most high-performance, demanding applications — especially in automotive and industrial sectors — UV-123 remains a reliable, versatile, and effective choice.
As the old saying goes: “You don’t choose a HALS — you choose a partner.” And in UV-123, you’ve got a partner that won’t leave you hanging under the sun ☀️.
📚 References
- Progress in Organic Coatings, Volume 155, 2021
- Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, Vol. 17, Issue 4, 2020
- European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Database, Substance ID: UV-123
- MarketsandMarkets Report: Global HALS Market Outlook, 2023
- BASF Technical Data Sheet: Tinuvin 144 and LS-1114
- Clariant Product Information: Chimassorb 944
- Cytec Additives Handbook, 2019 Edition
- Polymer Degradation and Stability, Volume 178, 2020
- Internal R&D Report, German Automotive Manufacturer, 2021
- Airbus Materials Testing Report, 2022
Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com
Comments