Evaluating the performance of Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether CAS 83016-70-0 in molded foam products

admin news3Read

Evaluating the Performance of Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether (CAS 83016-70-0) in Molded Foam Products

When it comes to molded foam products, whether they’re used in automotive seating, furniture cushions, or packaging materials, performance is everything. And at the heart of that performance lies chemistry — specifically, the additives and catalysts that help shape these foams into their final forms.

One such compound that’s been quietly making waves in the polyurethane industry is Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether, also known by its CAS number 83016-70-0. If you’ve never heard of it before, don’t worry — most people haven’t. But if you’re involved in foam formulation or polymer chemistry, this little-known ether might just be your new best friend.

In this article, we’ll take a deep dive into what makes this compound tick. We’ll explore its chemical properties, its role as a catalyst in foam production, how it stacks up against other similar compounds, and — most importantly — how it performs in real-world molded foam applications. Along the way, we’ll sprinkle in some data, comparisons, and even a few analogies to keep things interesting. Because let’s face it: talking about polyurethane catalysts doesn’t have to be dry.


What Exactly Is Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether?

Let’s start with the basics. Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether (hereafter referred to as TMEBAE) is an organic compound primarily used as a tertiary amine catalyst in polyurethane systems. Its molecular structure contains multiple hydroxyl and amine groups, which give it excellent reactivity and functionality in catalyzing the formation of urethane linkages during foam formation.

Chemical Properties Summary

Property Value
Molecular Formula C₁₆H₃₇NO₅
Molecular Weight ~323.48 g/mol
Appearance Colorless to pale yellow liquid
Viscosity (at 25°C) ~15–25 mPa·s
pH (1% aqueous solution) ~9.5–10.5
Flash Point ~120°C
Solubility in Water Slightly soluble
Boiling Point ~300°C

TMEBAE is often compared to other tertiary amine catalysts like DABCO, TEDA, and A-1 due to its ability to promote both polymerization and blowing reactions in polyurethane foam systems. But unlike some of its cousins, TMEBAE brings a unique balance of reactivity control, flowability, and curing speed, especially in molded foam applications.


The Role of Catalysts in Polyurethane Foam Production

Before we dive deeper into TMEBAE, it’s worth understanding why catalysts are so crucial in polyurethane foam manufacturing. In simple terms, polyurethane is formed through a reaction between polyols and isocyanates. This reaction produces two key processes:

  1. Gelation Reaction: Forms the polymer backbone.
  2. Blowing Reaction: Produces carbon dioxide (from water reacting with isocyanate), creating the foam structure.

Catalysts help speed up both reactions but can be tailored to favor one over the other depending on the desired foam characteristics. For example, in rigid foams, more blowing is needed; in flexible foams, gelation is prioritized.

In molded foam, where precision and consistency are paramount, the catalyst must not only initiate the reaction but also ensure uniform expansion and proper curing within the mold. That’s where TMEBAE shines.


Why Use TMEBAE in Molded Foams?

Molded foam products — think car seats, shoe insoles, or high-density cushioning — require precise control over density, cell structure, and demolding time. TMEBAE offers several advantages in this context:

1. Balanced Reactivity

Unlike some catalysts that either rush the reaction or drag it out, TMEBAE provides a balanced rise profile, allowing for smooth flow into complex molds without premature gelling.

2. Improved Flowability

Its molecular structure allows the reactive mixture to spread evenly in the mold before setting, reducing defects like voids or uneven thickness.

3. Faster Demolding Times

Because TMEBAE enhances early-stage crosslinking, it helps reduce the time required for the foam to reach sufficient rigidity for removal from the mold — a big win for manufacturers looking to boost throughput.

4. Low VOC Emissions

With increasing regulatory pressure on volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, TMEBAE stands out as a relatively low-emission catalyst option when compared to traditional amine-based catalysts.


Comparative Performance with Other Catalysts

To better understand TMEBAE’s value proposition, let’s compare it with some commonly used catalysts in molded foam systems.

Catalyst Gel Time Blow Time Demold Time VOC Level Mold Flow Notes
DABCO Moderate Fast Moderate Medium Good Classic all-rounder
TEDA Very Fast Very Fast Very Short High Fair Strong odor, high VOC
A-1 Fast Moderate Moderate Medium Excellent Good skin formation
TMEBAE Moderate-Fast Moderate Short-Moderate Low Excellent Balanced, clean, efficient

From this table, it’s clear that TMEBAE strikes a sweet spot between reactivity and processability. It doesn’t rush the system like TEDA, nor does it lag behind like some slower-reacting catalysts. Instead, it gives formulators control — and in molding operations, control is king.


Real-World Applications and Performance Data

Now let’s get into some actual performance metrics. Several studies, particularly from Asian and European polyurethane manufacturers, have evaluated TMEBAE in commercial molded foam settings.

Case Study 1: Automotive Seating Foam (Germany, 2021)

A major German automotive supplier tested TMEBAE in molded flexible foam for car seats. They replaced 30% of their standard DABCO content with TMEBAE and observed:

  • Demolding time reduced by 12%
  • Foam density remained consistent
  • Surface quality improved slightly
  • VOC levels dropped by 20%

The conclusion? TMEBAE could serve as a partial replacement for DABCO without compromising foam integrity, while offering environmental benefits.

Case Study 2: Shoe Insole Manufacturing (China, 2022)

In a study published in Polymer Materials Science & Engineering (2022), researchers substituted TEDA entirely with TMEBAE in a microcellular molded foam system for shoe insoles. Results included:

  • No loss in rebound resilience
  • Better mold filling behavior
  • Reduced odor complaints from workers
  • Slight increase in processing cost (offset by lower ventilation needs)

This suggests that TMEBAE may be ideal for sensitive environments where worker exposure and indoor air quality are concerns.


Formulation Tips and Best Practices

Using TMEBAE effectively requires attention to dosage and compatibility. Here are a few tips based on industrial practice:

Dosage Range

  • Typical usage level: 0.1 – 0.5 parts per hundred polyol (php)
  • Optimal range: 0.2 – 0.35 php for most molded systems

Too little and you lose catalytic efficiency; too much and you risk surface defects or overly rapid rise.

Compatibility with Other Additives

TMEBAE works well with:

  • Silicone surfactants
  • Physical blowing agents (e.g., water, pentane)
  • Flame retardants (e.g., TCPP, MDPP)

It should be added after the polyol blend is fully mixed to avoid premature reaction.

Storage and Handling

  • Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight.
  • Avoid prolonged contact with strong acids or oxidizing agents.
  • Use standard personal protective equipment (gloves, goggles).

Environmental and Health Considerations

As industries move toward greener chemistry, it’s important to assess the safety profile of any additive. According to the latest Safety Data Sheet (SDS) from leading suppliers:

  • Skin Irritation: Mild
  • Eye Contact: May cause irritation
  • Inhalation Risk: Low at normal use levels
  • Biodegradability: Moderate to good
  • LD₅₀ (oral, rat): >2000 mg/kg (low toxicity)

While not entirely benign, TMEBAE is considered safer than many older-generation amine catalysts. It’s also compatible with newer bio-based polyol systems, which is a plus for sustainable formulations.


Future Outlook and Emerging Trends

As demand for low-VOC, high-performance foams continues to grow, TMEBAE is likely to see increased adoption, especially in high-end molded applications where aesthetics, durability, and environmental impact matter.

Moreover, ongoing research in Asia is exploring hybrid catalyst systems that combine TMEBAE with enzymatic or metal-free alternatives, aiming to further reduce emissions and improve sustainability.

In Europe, stricter regulations under REACH and the EU Green Deal are pushing companies to phase out high-emission catalysts — another reason why TMEBAE might soon become a go-to choice for eco-conscious manufacturers.


Conclusion: TMEBAE — Not Just Another Catalyst

So, what have we learned?

Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether (CAS 83016-70-0) isn’t flashy. It won’t make headlines or trend on LinkedIn. But in the world of molded foam, it’s a quiet performer — reliable, balanced, and increasingly relevant in today’s environmentally conscious markets.

Whether you’re a chemist fine-tuning your next foam formula, a manufacturer looking to streamline your process, or simply someone curious about the science behind your car seat, TMEBAE is worth a closer look. It’s not just about making foam — it’s about making foam better, faster, and cleaner.

And really, isn’t that what innovation is all about? 🧪✨


References

  1. Müller, H., et al. (2021). "Evaluation of Novel Amine Catalysts in Automotive Polyurethane Foams." Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 138(12), 50123–50132.

  2. Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Chen, W. (2022). "Substitution of TEDA with TMEBAE in Microcellular Shoe Insole Foams." Polymer Materials Science & Engineering, 38(4), 78–85.

  3. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (2023). Substance Registration Dossier: Tri(methylhydroxyethyl)bisaminoethyl Ether (CAS 83016-70-0).

  4. Dow Chemical Company. (2020). Polyurethane Catalyst Handbook. Midland, MI.

  5. BASF Technical Bulletin. (2021). "Catalyst Selection Guide for Molded Flexible Foams."

  6. Safety Data Sheet – TMEBAE. (2023). Provided by Jiangsu Yabang Chemical Co., Ltd.

  7. Lee, K. M., & Park, J. H. (2020). "Low-VOC Catalyst Systems for Molded Polyurethane Foams." Foam Expo Conference Proceedings, Munich, Germany.

  8. ISO 105-B02:2014. Textiles – Tests for colour fastness – Part B02: Colour fastness to artificial light: Xenon arc fading lamp test.

  9. ASTM D3574-11. Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials—Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams.

  10. Ogawa, T., et al. (2019). "Advances in Enzymatic and Amine-Free Catalysts for Polyurethane Foams." Green Chemistry, 21(15), 4030–4041.


If you made it this far, congratulations! You now know more about TMEBAE than 99% of the population. Go forth and foam responsibly. 🧼🔥

Sales Contact:sales@newtopchem.com

admin
  • by Published on 2025-06-09 19:19:44
  • Reprinted with permission:https://www.morpholine.cc/28203.html
Comments  0  Guest  0